Weekend Editions

Thousands of books are published each year that none of us ever hear of. Many of these books are very good, and some of them are great. Agents, publicity, luck, money—all of these factors help determine whether we hear about a book, and sometimes even whether we think it’s a good book. We trust certain media sources to tell us what to read (or what movies to see) and thereby miss out on many good things. And writers miss out on gaining an audience.

I don’t remember why, in 1991, I read Louis Edwards’ first novel, Ten Seconds. I may have reviewed it for the old Cleveland Edition or the Plain Dealer. I know I selected it for my book group to read, because one member memorably remarked, “You like gimmicky books, Kathy.” The gimmick is that the story’s time frame is the ten seconds of a hundred-yard dash, and the novel consists of the thoughts and memories of a spectator as he watches the race. Each chapter consists of one second of the contest.

I liked the book and have remembered it all these years later. When I saw, somewhere, that Louis Edwards had written another novel, called Ramadan Ramsey, I picked it up to read. (Despite the Ten Seconds’ good reviews, Edwards’ two intervening novels, N: A Romantic Mystery and Oscar Wilde Discovers America, didn’t make much of a splash, and I was unaware of them until now.) I loved Ramadan so much I chose it for both of my book groups to read in August, where the readers, with only a few exceptions, enjoyed it too.

Ramadan Ramsey is a coming-of-age story about a black boy, the title character, growing up in New Orleans with a beloved grandmother. I don’t want to spoil anything about the plot’s many twists. Maurice Carlos Ruffin in the New York Times calls it “a warm, hopeful novel” and an “antidote to the darkness” that sometimes seems to be closing in around us. I know, a review in the Times is not exactly falling under the radar, but I have yet to meet anyone who has heard of Ramadan Ramsey. Let this be my recommendation to you. Pick it up. Give it a try.

Do you have a little-known favorite book? Have you had any luck sharing it with others? Comment below.

While you’re at it, check out this list of famous writers’ recommendations of little-known books. By the way, I second Jonathan Franzen’s endorsement of The Man Who Loved Children by Christina Stead.  

https://www.gq.com/story/21-brilliant-books-youve-never-heard-of
Posted in Books, Weekend Editions | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Wednesday Word

A certain redacted affidavit has been in the news. As far as I know, reporters have not yet explicated the all-important Latin derivation of these newsworthy words. Today’s post remedies the oversight.

Redacted comes from a Latin verb, ago, that appears in a zillion (approximately) derivatives and Latin phrases and idioms. Its participle* is actum. As you might guess, virtually all of our English words containing ­forms of act come from this verb, such as act, action, active, react, re-enact, actual, activate, actor. You get the idea. There are a lot.

Because ago appeared in so many guises, it had many, many meanings, depending on context. This multiplicity of meanings, by the way, drives Latin students crazy. How can the same verb mean “drive,” “lead,” “do,” “act,” “pass,” “spend,” “incite,” “intend,” “perform,” “plead,” and with the noun gratias, “thank”?  The answer is context, my friend. It all depends on the idiom. For the sake of comparison, consider our verb put. I can put my coffee down on the table or I can put you down, I can put off an unpleasant duty and be put off by your attitude, I am put out when things don’t go my way, I can tell you to put a cork in it, and I can put on the dog for a night on the town. What, then, does put mean? Hmmm? So don’t blame Latin for tiny little ago and its heavy load of meaning.

Latin, like English, had many words rooted in ago and actum. Redigo and its participle redactum was one of them. See where we’re going with this?

Redigo combines re-, meaning “back” or “again,” and our new favorite Latin verb ago. (The “d” in the middle means nothing; it helps make the verb pronounceable.) A redaction is a “driving back” or  “reduction.” In its simplest sense, redacting means “editing.” As you know, its usage these days implies editing out troublesome, sensitive, or libelous material. Those long blackened lines!

Its partner in crime, affidavit, is an actual Latin verb, the third person singular perfect tense form of affidare, meaning “to swear.” Another meaning, “to promise fidelity,” reveals the inner root word fides, which means “trust” or “faith” (as in semper fidelis) and which will help you spell affidavit correctly from this day forward (i.e., no affadavit). In Latin, affidavit means “he or she has sworn.” In the law, an affidavit is a written sworn statement. In the case of the affidavit in the news, it’s a written sworn statement by an FBI special agent. He or she has sworn to tell the truth.

If you’re interested in reading the unredacted sections of the aforementioned affidavit, here it is.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119588357/trump-warrant-affidavit-mar-a-lago-search

*In case you’ve forgotten your grammar, a participle (the perfect passive participle, for our purposes) is a verb form usually used as an adjective or as part of a verb in a sentence. The participle of drive, for example, is driven. The participle of shrive is shriven. The participle of dive is (ha!) dived.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119588357/trump-warrant-affidavit-mar-a-lago-search

Questions, comments, and written sworn statements are welcome.

Posted in Wednesday Word | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Monday Meals

I happened on an America’s Test Kitchen video featuring the always cheerful Becky, who demonstrated how to make Chilled Soba Noodle Salad. The vegetables looked so good, and Becky made it look so easy, that I tried it myself last week. The recipe served me and my husband for two dinners, supplemented by corn on the cob and some dinner rolls. Pretty good, but it was a lot of trouble (for me, not for Becky) and probably not worth making again.

Here’s the thing, though. It involved my buying a bunch of ingredients I have never used before and may never use again. A package of soba noodles was fine; we used the whole eight-ounce bag. The leftover vegetables, including sugar snap peas, radishes, and scallions, will also soon disappear from our kitchen. A jar full of sesame seeds, however, will linger in my spice cabinet for some time.  If I try, I’ll probably eventually use up the sesame oil. My ginger root will find its way into something.

Most problematic is/are the nor, or Japanese seaweed, which comes in a package of ten sheets. The soba salad recipe required one sheet. Doing the math, I’m left with nine sheets of nor. I am unsure how to store them, let alone use them. (Don’t bother to google this for me; I will do that myself eventually.)

Preparing even my one sheet of nor was problematic. You’re supposed to crisp the sheet over a gas flame. Because I have an electric range, I toasted it as well as I could in a non-stick frying pan. Inevitably, I forgot about it for a few minutes and burned part of it, which I cut away. I’m sure nor is extremely nutritious, but the taste was a little seaweedy-y, so I’m not dying to add it to something else.

I’m usually cautious about purchasing items useful for only one recipe, but Becky is so damn charming. And by the time I wrote down the ingredients, headed to the grocery store, enlisted two employees to scour the shelves for sesame seeds, and hunted down the nor and soba noodles myself, I was in too deep. Have you ever bought one-recipe items? Do you have an ancient bottle of black seed oil hanging out in your pantry? Do you throw such things away, or leave them on the shelf for the people who will eventually buy your house? Tell us what’s on your shelves!

Posted in Monday Meals | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Weekend Editions

My husband has a knack for naming film series. The Cleveland Cinematheque’s current schedule, for example, includes a series of nine movies by W.C. Fields cleverly dubbed “Fields Days.” Another series featuring a Swedish female director named Mai Zetterling is called “My, My, Mai.”

Because of his uncanny talent, I gave John the task of naming my Friday posts, intended to be about books and reading. He suggested “Fiction Fridays,” but I told him that I might want to write about non-fiction or poetry. After a few more false starts, he came up with “Weekend Editions,” which, though lacking alliteration, affords me a space to spill into Saturdays and Sundays. Opportunities to procrastinate are always welcome.

My husband expressed only one caveat. “Hopefully you won’t receive a cease and desist order from NPR,” he warned. Until I hear from the NPR lawyers, Weekend Editions will be closing out my blogging week, following Monday Meals and language and etymology on Word Wednesdays.

This week I’ve been thinking about a trend in popular culture featuring characters with Asperger’s syndrome or exhibiting traits of autism. Think Sheldon Cooper and Amy Farrah Fowler on TV’s “Big Bang Theory” and Claire Danes in the film “Temple Grandin.” If these portrayals can avoid becoming offensive and also help viewers learn about and accept differences, then that’s a good thing.

The Maid, a novel by Nita Prose, was recommended by someone I enjoy on YouTube. Knowing nothing else about it, I checked the book out of the library. On the first page, the narrator, Molly, a maid at a fancy hotel, says, “I’ve got simple, dark hair that I maintain in a sharp, neat bob. I part my hair in the middle—the exact middle. I comb it flat and straight. I like things simple and neat.” I certainly don’t begrudge people on the spectrum having a chance to see themselves on screen or in fiction, but I’ll admit to a sinking feeling as I read these lines.

It seems to me that characters with Asperger’s syndrome have become a little too prevalent, a little trite, a little commonplace. In this novel especially, Molly’s quirks become a heavy-handed novelistic device. You imagine a writer thinking, Unreliable narrators are interesting, right? What if our narrator had trouble reading other people’s intentions? What if she were deceived by nefarious people and framed with a crime? A genius could probably make this premise work. Here, though, Molly’s relentless misapprehensions seem exaggerated.

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close—certainly autism and novels sometimes mix well. However, if right now you Google “Asperger’s fiction” or “characters with autism,” as many as thirty or forty titles pop up. Maybe you can think of examples yourself. At what point, I wonder, does a bona fide trend become merely trendy? Let me know what you think.

Posted in Books, Weekend Editions | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Wednesday Word

I was thinking about how most of us rarely use actual cameras anymore. Our kids and grand kids will naturally think of cameras as a function of their cell phones. But the history of the word “camera” hearkens back to an earlier version of the device.

The Latin word “camera” means “chamber” (another derivative) or “room.” An early camera was a truncated form of “camera obscura,” or “dark room.” If you owned or have seen an old Brownie camera, you have seen that little dark chamber, holding the light-sensitive film safely inside the darkness.

Image credit to Jen Theodore on Unsplash
Image credit to Jen Theodore on Unsplash

Other English words derive from this root as well. Our legislature is called “bicameral,” because it has two houses, or rooms, the Senate and the House of Representatives. (Not because elected officials love to appear before the cameras.) A chamberlain, a royal officer who attends a king or high-ranking noble, is in literal terms a person who manages chambers, or rooms. A “camcorder” combines “camera” with “recorder.”

And how does “comrade” relate? Well, you’re chummy enough with a comrade that you’d be willing to share a room with him or her.

Our comrades are a far cry from the root word “camera.” And the skinny hand-held devices that can “hold” thousands of photos are a far cry from the old Brownie “chamber,” a handsome box that protected our pictures until we could drop off the film at the drug store.

P.S. Some of you will recognize this post as a continuation of Word of the Day on the Facebook “Latin at CSU” page. Latin, alas, is no more at CSU, so a weekly etymology will be appearing here on Wednesdays. Suggestions are welcome!

Posted in Uncategorized, Wednesday Word | Tagged | 4 Comments

Monday Meals

(I’m reviving the blog in anticipation of the publication of a new book, the date of which is uncertain. The plan for the blog is to devote different days of the week to different subjects. Monday’s “m” will remind me to write about meals in the broadest sense, that is, about food and cooking.)

Every January I resolve that I’m going to try new recipes in the new year, delving into my neglected cookbooks. “Every January” tells you how successful I’ve been.

Retiring from teaching seems like a new beginning, almost like a new year. Inspired again to explore those cookbooks, I recently pulled Food Editors’ Favorites: Treasured Recipes off the kitchen shelf. Published to benefit the Newspaper Food Editors and Writers Association, reprinted in 1983 on behalf of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, this book features favorite home-cooked dishes of food editors around the country.  One of them is a delicious bundt cake I have often made. For several years, I offered it for a friend for her birthday, after she expressed delight in it the first time. And a super critical older woman of my acquaintance, known for her cooking skills, asked me for the recipe after I brought it to a church event years ago. That woman’s request for my recipe was like winning a culinary Pulitzer Prize.

I’ve also stirred up for the occasional party this book’s curry dip, submitted by Peggy Dunn of the Milwaukee Journal. Because the cake and the curry have been successes, you’d think I’d try other recipes, but, alas, I’ve barely sampled them. Last week, I cracked open the book and put together the Southwest Salad (Jane Baker, the Phoenix Gazette). As is often the case, I didn’t have all the ingredients and wouldn’t have wanted to include hot pepper sauce and chopped chilies anyway; still, the result was satisfying. I’ll add the recipe below.

While I had the book open, I made the old favorite bundt cake as well. It’s simple and dependable. The only challenge it presents is the directive to beat for 10 minutes, an arm-fatiguing time if you don’t own a stand mixer. As a result, I usually cheat. Seven to eight minutes seems to work just fine.  

Bundt Cake

2 cups sugar 2 cups flour 1 cup softened butter 5 room temperature eggs

1 tablespoon flavoring (vanilla, lemon, or almond extract, or a mixture thereof)

Preheat oven to 325 degrees. Grease bundt pan generously, even nonstick ones. Combine all ingredients and beat until smooth, about 10 minutes. Pour into prepared pan. Bake about 1 hour or until cake is done, i.e., the temperature has reached 200 to 210 degrees.

Posted in Books, Monday Meals | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Lead Me, Guide Me Reviewed

Thanks to the Heights Observer and my friend Robin Koslen for this review.

http://www.heightsobserver.org/read/2020/07/30/ewing-describes-an-exemplary-life-in-new-book

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Worry Room

Father Dan used to imagine that our minds have a separate compartment reserved for worrying. ( I wrote about this on 4/4/20 in “Patting the Puppy.”) Let’s say our son is hanging with disreputable friends, we’re waiting to hear back on a medical test, our dad is becoming increasingly forgetful, and we can’t remember the last time we saw our wallet. Plenty of guests for the worry room. We ping from one travail to the other, fretting away the hours of our life. But then, Father Dan would say, suppose we learn that the son’s good influence is helping his friends, our test comes back negative, our dad is merely distractible, and our wallet slipped under the seat of the car. Hurray! For a short time, we feel relieved and grateful, but soon enough other worries begin creeping in. What’s that sound my car engine is making? How will I ever afford to fix it? We forget to shut the worry door, and a whole new set of problems rushes into that (metaphorical) space in our brain.

The last few weeks I’ve been obsessing over a legal worry. I tried channeling Father Dan wisdom, tried meditating and prayer, tried talking to friends and experts. All the efforts helped, but even so I pretty much took up residence in the worry room, especially in the wee hours of the night.

Thankfully, the issue has been resolved, and I’m still in a relieved and grateful mode. But worries about Covid 19, the start of school, and a Cold War with China are banging away at the door. Somehow the simple concept of a room that wants to fill up, no matter what, helps me. It strengthens me to bolt the lock, at least for awhile.

Posted in Father Dan Begin | 10 Comments

We Shall Overcome

I’ve just finished reading a great book by a great American writer many people have probably never heard of. Robert Caro has devoted his life to writing two massive works: The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York and the five-volume (at 83, he’s still working on volume five) biography called The Years of Lyndon Johnson. The book I just finished was a timeout from his massive LBJ project called Working, published last year. It reveals the behind-the-scenes strategies of an indefatigable researcher and meticulous craftsman.

You might imagine that if you’re not particularly interested in Robert Moses or LBJ, Caro’s books are not for you. Perhaps you’re right. But I’d make the argument that the subject of a book needn’t attract or deter you from a book. Friends have told me they’re not interested in certain books, both fiction and non-fiction, because they’re “about” tennis or a couple’s honeymoon or 1920’s Paris. I reply that the books may not actually be “about” those things. They may actually be about America or love or families. The apparent subject is a guise for talking about other deeper, more interesting things. Or, just as important, the value of the book may be the skill of the writer and his or her eloquent and beautiful prose. I have only a passing interest in baseball, for instance, but used to love Roger Angell’s baseball essays in the New Yorker. You needed no baseball expertise to appreciate their grace.

So, too, with Working. It’s about Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson, to be sure, but sort of in the way that Moby-Dick is about a whale. The anecdotes about the two movers and shakers are gripping, just like Melville’s three-chapter account of chasing down the white whale at the end of his novel. But both writers have plenty of other things on their minds. Working is about American history, about single-minded dedication to one’s work (a la Ahab?), about political power, about race in America, about the tragedy of great men whose power outstrips their wisdom, about writing, about research, about poverty, about interviewing, about marriage, and so many other things. If you disregard a book based on its apparent subject, you may be missing out.

Working has remarkable relevance to today, in a way that Caro couldn’t quite have predicted as he compiled the book before 2019. He devotes a beautiful chapter near the end of the book, called “Two Songs,” to the contrast between LBJ’s monumental achievements at home—the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Medicare, Head Start, bringing electricity to Texas’s hill country—and the tragedy and crime of the war in Vietnam.

One of the two songs is “We Shall Overcome,” which Caro intends to explicate in his final LBJ volume. He approaches the subject with humility. “The writing will have to be pretty good to capture what that song meant,” he says, “but I’m going to try.” His words reminded me of singing that song with the congregation at St. Cecilia’s years ago during Martin Luther King, Jr., weekend. We’d leave our pews and circle around the perimeter of the church, holding hands, black people and white people, and sing verse after verse: “We shall overcome,” “We are not afraid,” “We’ll walk hand in hand.” Who knew when I picked up a book seemingly about the lives of Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson, I’d be swept back to that time?

Anyway, in the “Two Songs” chapter, Caro describes how 1965 saw the violent attack on protestors, including Congressman John Lewis, in Selma, Alabama, at the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Soon after this egregious police violence, Lyndon Johnson rode from the White House to the Capitol to deliver a speech advocating for his voting rights bill and on the way could hear demonstrators singing “We Shall Overcome.” Johnson’s speech, Caro tells us, made Martin Luther King cry, a sight, his aides said, they had never seen before.

 Caro writes, “And of course the speech that Johnson gave is one of the greatest speeches, one of the greatest moments in American history. I watch it over and over. I’m thrilled every time. [Johnson] said, ‘Their cause must be our cause too. Because it is not just Negroes, but really it is all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice. And we shall overcome.’”

Our enemies, Johnson said, are not our fellow man, not our neighbors, but “poverty, ignorance, disease.” Good writers can remind us of the history that’s always with us. It’s alive, good and bad, right in this moment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Launch Party

You’re invited to a virtual launch party for Lead Me, Guide Me: The Life and Example of Father Dan Begin tonight, Tuesday, June 23, at 7:00 pm.

Log on to the website of Macs Backs-Books on Coventry to find the Facebook Live event. Or go to Mac’s Backs Facebook page and click on the link there.

Bring your own wine.

The event is archived at Mac’s Backs website: https://www.facebook.com/macs.coventry/videos/191873012206744

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment