Green Shoes

Brandon Marshall

Celebrities such a football players are too often in the news for bad reasons, but both my kids have, at various times, alerted me to Brandon Marshall, a Chicago Bears receiver, who’s outed himself as suffering from borderline personality disorder. They know about my interest because they know about my book, Missing: Coming to Terms with a Borderline Mother, in which I describe my mom’s undiagnosed BPD.

At Thursday night’s game with the Giants, Marshall’s bright green shoes attracted attention amidst a sea of pink, which other players wore for breast-cancer awareness. Marshall expected to be fined $5000 by the NFL  for wearing the wrong color, and then planned to donate an additional $5000 to a breast cancer group.

He wore the wrong shoes in honor of Mental Illness Awareness Week, which just ended yesterday. He began the Brandon Marshall Foundation to address mental health issues and credits Dr. Marsha Linehan, who developed dialectical behavior therapy, as an inspiration. Dr. Linehan came out with her own struggles with BPD at about the same time as Marshall.

These people are very brave.

So, who’s inspiring you these days?

 

Posted in Books, BPD-Related, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Gilmour, Eh

Through that chain of connections we call the internet, I happened upon a Canadian controversy. It seems that one David Gilmour, a part-time English professor at the University of Toronto, has outraged a bunch of people by declaring that he’s not interested in teaching books by women. “Virginia Woolf is the only writer that interests me as a woman writer,” he says in an interview on Hazlitt, a Random House website, “so I do teach one of her short stories. But once again, when I was given this job I said I would only teach the people that I truly, truly love. Unfortunately, none of those happen to be Chinese, or women. . .What I teach is guys. Serious heterosexual guys.  F. Scott Fitzgerald, Chekhov, Tolstoy. Real guy-guys. Henry Miller. Philip Roth.”

Gilmour, unfortunately, had even more to say, including, “I teach only the best.”

While I was clicking on links, a link suddenly clicked in my own head: I had reviewed a book by this guy! I recalled a distinct sexist leaning in that book, a memoir about homeschooling his teenage son. A movie buff, Gilmour decided that his troubled son should drop out of school so that they could watch movies together. A former homeschooler myself, I didn’t object to Gilmour’s unconventional educational philosophy, but his tone and attitude set my teeth on edge. Here’s what I wrote in 2009:

“One of Gilmour’s blind spots is a dismissive, distorted attitude toward women. Throughout the book, he devotes lots of space to actors such as Brando, Nicholson, Walken, and Hopper. But only one woman, Audrey Hepburn, merits even a paragraph. He offers his son the raunchy Basic Instinct as ‘dessert’ after Francois Truffaut’s The Four Hundred Blows and gives him macho advice regarding girlfriends. And this might be the time to point out that Gilmour never consulted his ex-wife, Jesse’s mom, about the homeschooling idea.”

I go on to describe Gilmour as a gasbag regarding movies; his son is a captive audience, and Gilmour relishes telling him exactly what to think about them. My major objection to The Film Club is that as a narrator, as a persona in the book, Gilmour lacks self-awareness. If he joked about his limitations or biases, if he were more self-critical, the tone wouldn’t be so off-putting. In his cluelessness, he comes across as a jerk.

The poor guy does no better in his frantic (Save my job, save the sales of my new book, save my possible Giller Prize!!) apologies. It’s pretty much a rule that someone who says, “I don’t have a sexist bone in my body,” harbors a little macho in his metatarsals. Men who admit they’re works in progress are much more convincing. And likeable.

Funnily enough, in some earlier reading this evening (The New Yorker, September 23rd), I encountered a great word, mansplaining, defined in the Urban Dictionary as “explain in a patronizing manner, assuming total ignorance on the part of those listening. The mansplainer is often shocked and hurt when their mansplanation is not taken as absolute fact, criticized, or even rejected altogether.”

David Gilmour is shocked that he could be so misunderstood! He takes no responsibility but rather blames his interviewer, to whom he consistently refers as “this young woman,” as in, “And this is a young woman who kind of wanted to make a little name for herself.” (Uh-huh. He actually says “little name” in his apology.) In short, he’s sorry she transcribed his actual words, as the transcript shows.  “And so I’ve apologized,” he mansplains. “I said I’m sorry for hurting your sensibilities.”

 

 

 

 

Posted in Books, Movies, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Abundance

William Maxwell

I have too many books to read right now. This is my usual condition, but it’s particularly acute right now since my visits to the library this afternoon. I say visits because I had requested books from two different libraries. This abundance of reading material is pleasing rather than disheartening. I couldn’t wait to get home with my stash. Here’s what I’ve been dipping into.

My book group chose So Long, See You Tomorrow by William Maxwell for this month’s discussion, at my recommendation. I reread this lovely novella a couple of days ago, having checked it out from the Cleveland State library, but now I’m on a quest to read more Maxwell and more about him. The Book That Changed My Life, edited by Roxanne J. Cody and Joy Johannessen, offers essays by “71 remarkable writers” who “celebrate the books that matter most to them.” Steward O’Nan selected So Long, and I’ve already read his brief essay. Maxwell is generally revered by writers, for his conciseness, his compassion, and his creative approach to narration.  I’m looking forward to reading more of the essays in the collection: poet Billy Collins on Lolita and The Yearling, Elizabeth Berg on The Catcher in the Rye, Frank McCourt on Henry VIII, and so on. This will be fun to dip into.

The second volume of Karl Ove Knausgaard’s My Struggle, at 573 pages, will require more plunging than dipping. This weirdly mesmerizing memoir may not get finished, especially since other people are breathing down my neck, hoping to tackle this Norwegian themselves. Karl will either fascinate you or annoy you. Check out the first volume to see which group you belong to.

I may not finish & Sons by David Gilbert, for the same reasons: it’s long (434 pages) and, because other people are waiting for it, I won’t be allowed to renew it. I requested this novel because my niece, a good reader and reliable recommender, suggested I read it. Its excellent first sentence, “Once upon a time, the moon had a moon,” is calling to me.

I picked up Framing Innocence: A Mother’s Photographs, a Prosecutor’s Zeal, and a Small Town’s Response because its Oberlin author, Lynn Powell, is in my writing group. This 2010 work reports on a case you may remember, about a mom who got in trouble for photographing her daughter in the nude. It looks to be a thorough and compassionate account.

Like lots of my friends, I hear about intriguing books on NPR. A fan of Linda Ronstadt, I heard her interviewed on Terry Gross’s Fresh Air, where she talked about her new memoir Simple Dreams. It’s full of good photos, and a quick perusal offered a tantalizing sample of interesting anecdotes.

Let’s end where we began, with the redoubtable William Maxwell. Barbara Burkhardt’s William Maxwell: a Literary Life promises to slake my curiosity about this quiet and compassionate writer.

I haven’t even mentioned the books I should be reading for school. But enough about my to-do list. What are you reading, and, more important, how is it?

 

 

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Hurt Like I Do

Randy Newman

I get on a Randy Newman kick now and then. Today, playing a Newman cd while I was baking, I was struck by the song “Marie.” Lushly orchestrated, this version features a warm, romantic background, like so many Newman songs, belying the barbed lyrics.

“Marie” sounds like a love song, but it’s a love song sung by a jerk. The personae of Newman songs are complicated; “Marie’s” is drunk and prone to cliche and heedless of Marie’s feelings most of the time. And yet, he manages to sing a moving love song. Newman packs the complexity of an Alice Munro short story into the three-minute length of a pop song, or perhaps I should say “pop song.”

Anyway, there was no stopping me then. I looked up a YouTube video of “Marie,” and then checked out other Newman favorites, like “Jolly Coppers on Parade” and “Feels Like Home” from his Faust collection.

Finally I landed on “I Want You To Hurt Like I Do.” In this video, Newman’s introduction is imbued with his familiar blend of scalding sarcasm and good-humored self-deprecation. It’s a Randy Newman “We Are the World,” he says. Imagine, he says, good celebrities–Bruce, Sting, Kenny Rogers, and other Kenny’s–singing in chorus, swaying to the melody. (So I once again checked out, of course, “We Are the World,” which I still like.)  

But instead of the charitable sentiments of Michael Jackson’s anthem, Newman’s begins “I ran out on my children” and then repeats the refrain “I just want you to hurt like I do.” It’s about wanting others to feel your pain. It’s not about love and light and doing good. It’s about the dark human tendency to hurt when you’ve been hurt. 

I relied on this song when writing about my mom and the hurtful lashing out that’s characteristic of borderline personality disorder. Newman doesn’t let us off the hook—we all do it. But, if mental illness is an exaggeration of the normal, then people with people with BPD, because they hurt more, sometimes do it a little more than the rest of us. Here’s what I wrote in Missing:                    

           A typical exchange would go like this. We’re sitting in the kitchen, in tense silence. My mother has just told me that I’m breaking her heart by dating a divorced guy. She can’t sleep. She can’t understand what’s happened  to her perfect daughter. Why do I not care about her? She shakes her head, and cries, and looks more enraged at every response I offer. She’s glad, she says at last, that my father isn’t there to see my behavior. He was a puritan, she tells me. He was conservative about morals and marriage and divorce. He would be ashamed, she says, to know I was dating a divorced man.

I’m 21, and lost my dad only two years before. I still feel sad and guilty about my silence during his illness and write in my journal and pray and cry frequently about failing him. I miss him all the time and find my mother even more difficult to deal with, without him there as a buffer. Hearing that my dad would be ashamed of me is the harshest thing my mother could say to me.  

So, I try again with my mother. I explain how painful this particular argument is. I tell her, “I hear what you’re saying, and there’s no way I’m going to forget it. But you should understand how much it hurts me for you to say that Dad would be ashamed of me. I’ve heard you and will think about what you’ve said. Just never say that particular thing again.” 

A fleeting and enigmatic expression crosses her face. I can’t parse my mother’s discomfiting expression. She doesn’t look indignant or offended, still less compassionate and understanding. To say she looks pleased would be going too far, but perhaps I see a split second of satisfaction.

In any event, my plea has no effect. She repeats the remark about my dad often. Though I know her well, this always surprises me. Why would she not explain her concerns calmly and counsel me? Why does she deliberately say the most wounding thing she can?

Decades later, after a lot more  life experience, with soul searching and a little wisdom, I gain some insight. A suffering friend told me, “I don’t believe anyone can understand how I’m hurting unless they’re hurting, too.” It was as though my mother had returned to explain herself to me.

My sisters and I often remark that my mother believed she was powerless. She thought we didn’t listen. She had no idea how deeply her words wounded us. She thought she had to lash out just to have any effect at all.

But now, my friend had explained why. My mother was in pain. She was always in pain and was hurting even more because she feared I was abandoning her. No one could know how much she hurt. But if she passed on a little pain, if she struck out, if she flailed around and made a few barbs stick, maybe someone would share a tiny bit of the hurt and she wouldn’t feel so alone.

In Alice Sebold’s novel The Almost Moon, a frustrated adult daughter smothers her recalcitrant, critical mother in a moment of rage. “It was my mother’s disappointments that were enumerated in our household,” Sebold writes, “and that I saw before me every day as if they were posted on our fridge–a static list that my presence could not assuage.” I recognize the mother, and I recognize the rage.

 

 

Posted in Books, BPD-Related, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

All Roads Lead to Rome

My Latin students never know what’s in store for them. Some days it’s a tedious review of demonstrative pronouns, and other days a fascinating account of my medical problems. Today they heard about my feet.

That’s because yesterday I received a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. This common ailment (“All your neighbors and friends have already told you what you have, right?” the podiatrist said) afflicts hard-training athletes and also older people–guess which category I’m in–and causes a stinging pain in the sole of the foot, particularly the heel. It hurts like heck when your feet hit the floor in the morning. I walked too much in thin-soled sandals this summer, especially on our vacation, and inflicted this problem upon myself. “Fascia’s probably a Latin word, isn’t it?” the doctor mused, after chatting for a moment about my job, thereby providing me with an etymology lesson for my class today.

We began with planta, the Latin word for the sole of the foot. Some of the students had heard of plantar’s warts. I asked if they could see a connection between the sole of the foot and plants, as in green things growing in your garden. The verb to plant actually makes the connection clearer. The gardener digs a little and then covers the seeds using the sole of his or her foot. The planta  plants things.

What about an auto plant? Why do we sometimes call factories plants? Because, my students figured out, they produce things, like a plant growing in nature. That pretty much covers the plantar in plantar fasciitis.

Then, we moved on to –itis. Many students already knew this suffix means inflammation. These Greek-derived medical morphemes are useful to know. An –ema is a swelling (emphysema), a –pathy  is a disease (cardiopathy), and a ­–rrhea is a discharge, for which you presumably can provide your own example. It’s good for you to know what an –ectomy is before your surgeon picks up a knife.

In English, the fascia of fasciitis refers to the sheath of ligaments that connect the heel to the arch and toes of the foot. In Latin, fascia means a bundle or band (or even bandage). So plantar fasciitis means the sheath of ligaments in the sole of my foot are inflamed. (And a Spanish fajita sheathes the savory fillings inside.)

Fasces

This information provokes another question. What about the fasces, the symbol of Roman power? The emperor’s minions carried these bundles of sticks with an ax sticking out as they processed around town. Some say the sticks and ax represented tools for flogging and beheading, respectively; a more sanguine explanation makes the bundled sticks the unified Roman people and the ax their collective power. Either way, the fasces represents the absolute power of the state. As I’m sure you’ve already surmised, this emblem gave rise to the terms fascist and fascism.

So, are fascia and fasces related? They’re not the same word, but they are siblings, both describing bundled things. My foot’s fascia, and yours, are connected etymologically to the fearsome symbol of Roman imperial power. See the title of this post.

Posted in Teaching | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Family, Fashion, and Freaks

Sarah Polley, a young actress and director, has created another one of those engrossing documentaries (like Still Bill or Searching for Sugar Man) that you want everyone to see because they’re so good. In carefully ordered sequences, she reveals secrets about her family. Or, more accurately, she gets her family members to reveal secrets about themselves. The stories they tell relate most directly to Sarah herself and her parentage. I don’t want to say more, due to the film’s exquisitely maintained suspense, except to tell you to see Stories We Tell at the Cleveland Cinematheque this weekend, Thursday at 9:05 pm or Sunday at 6:30 pm.

A different kind of exquisite is Miyazaki’s animated feature Castle in the Sky (Friday 7:00 pm; Saturday  5:00 pm). Get your kids and grandkids there, and get yourself there, too. All of Miyazaki’s films are charming and beautiful, but this one—about a spunky little girl and a magical floating island—is especially so.

Two other Cinematheque offerings this weekend some might regard as guilty pleasures. The documentary Scatter My Ashes at Bergdorf’s profiles the pricey, plush New York store. It features commentary by bunches of celebrities, exhibits fashions and riches galore, and looks highly entertaining. It shows Saturday at 7:25 pm and Sunday at 4:00 pm. Sofia Coppola’s The Bling Ring (Saturday 9:20 pm; Sunday 8:40 pm) features fashions of the stolen variety. It’s based on the fascinating true story (watch the ABC story here) of seven young Californians who burgled the homes of rich Los Angelenos, including Paris Hilton, just because they wanted some glamour to rub off on them. This fictionalized version gives Emma Watson a chance to shed her Hogwarts uniform for some designer gear.

William Blake

Clevelander Jim Jarmusch’s quirky Dead Man also shows this weekend, combining two of my favorite male celebrities: Johnny Depp and William Blake. Depp plays a character with the poet’s name who takes a spiritual journey from Cleveland into the 19th century American West. Also featured are the always eccentric Iggy Pop, Crispin Glover, and (musically) Neil Young. I saw this film when it came out (1995) and found it mordantly funny. (Thursday, 6:45 pm; Friday, 9:30 pm ).

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More to Say about Violence, Women, and Hate Crimes

Our Cleveland newspaper’s website just published an opinion piece of mine about classifying some violent crimes against women as hate crimes. As you may know, Cleveland has recently been too much in the news regarding abuse of women. A couple of years ago, it was Anthony Sowell and his house of horrors on Imperial Avenue, which I cross every week on my way to GED tutoring. Then, recently, three women escaped ten years’ captivity under the control of Ariel Castro. Most recently, an Anthony Sowell copycat, Michael Madison, was arrested for killing three women in his neighborhood.

Weirdly, some people seem to believe that such men just happen to kill women. They’re crazy killers who pick the easiest target. If that were so, wouldn’t they kill even easier targets, like children or even babies? Others believe that such men are sexual deviants and get turned on by abusing women. That may well be true, but their expressed purpose–the motivation they actually verbalize, over and over again–is hatred. They hate women. That’s why they kill them.

I had limited space in the paper to make my case. With a few hundred more words, I would have pointed out that the “hate crime” label does not apply to every crime against women, just as every crime against any minority group doesn’t constitute a hate crime.  A criminal can murder a Jew without anti-Semitism. It may happen in the course of a robbery. Or a neighbor might be pissed off about a barking dog and shoot the owner, who happens to be Jewish. These are terrible crimes, but they’re not hate crimes.

Similarly, a husband can kill his wife in order to collect the insurance and run off with his girlfriend. A male robber can kill the female clerk at the convenience store. These crimes are not hate crimes.

The special category stigmatizes particular crimes regarding their motivation. This stigma sometimes makes the penalties harsher than they would otherwise be. I’m not especially interested in making the penalties harsher. The value of the “hate crime” designation, for me,  is its educational value. It makes us aware that racist vandals are still destroying temples and Jewish cemeteries and burning down black churches. It highlights the beating of a gay man on a dark city street. It makes these crimes not random or generic events, but targeted abusive outrages that we, as a society, need to recognize, keep a tally of, and work hard at eradicating. We need to express horror, special horror, when entire groups become targets of violent crime.

In 1938, the rioters who broke windows and raped and killed Jews on Kristallnacht in Germany weren’t drunk college kids on a spree. They were harbingers of horrors to come. It was important to recognize their motivation. They were harassing Jews because they hated Jews.

Similarly, certain men (blessedly few in number), because of faulty genes or an abusive childhood, develop a seething hatred of women that compels them to abuse and murder them. To me, a murder that involves kidnapping, rape and torture, strangling, calculated terrorizing and pain, is in a special category. It is worse than other killings. It is a crime of hate, and our society should recognize this.

Maybe then we can grapple with it. Now, instead, people watch a video of an unconscious young woman in Steubenville (Ohio, again!) being abused and ridiculed by young men for entertainment. They see young men calling this young woman a bitch and a whore and worse. Maybe if we, through our laws, expressed moral outrage at such behavior, we could begin to address what makes our young men–in high schools, on sports teams, in the military–despise and disparage women.

What we’re doing now is not working.

Share your ideas here, or, even better, at the original piece on Cleveland.com.  Thanks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Good Choices This Weekend

I’ve never seen Richard Pryor’s Which Way Is Up? (1977) and expect to try it at the Cleveland Cinematheque tonight or tomorrow (5:15 and 9:45, respectively), forewarned that it’s raunchy. I don’t think I’ve seen any Richard Pryor movies, in fact, a gap I look forward to closing. The Cleveland Plain Dealer made it their movie pick this weekend.

A fan of Jean Renoir, I’m also eager to see The River (1951), a rare English-language, color film by this director. Many of my friends saw the gorgeous Renoir recently at the Cedar-Lee Theater here in Cleveland Heights. It was lush but a little vapid to me; still,  it showed the relationship between the painter father and the filmmaker (to-be) son, and also described the beginnings of Jean’s relationship with his first wife, one of his father’s models. If you check out Renoir, My Father from the library, you see lots of photos which demonstrate the film’s artful set and costume design. You can also read Jean’s own version of his relationship with Catherine Hessling, who became his muse and star.

While we’re talking about Renoirs, pere et fils,  let me tell you about my recent vacation. We visited Philadelphia for a few days and stopped in at the Barnes Foundation and exhausted ourselves looking at the densely packed walls of paintings there. Dr. Albert C. Barnes amassed the largest collection of paintings–181– by Auguste Renoir in the world. That’s not the largest collection outside France; it’s the largest collection anywhere. And, frankly, it’s too many Renoirs to take in in one day, or three days, or even four, especially when they hang amid dozens of other people’s paintings. Barnes was a collector extraordinaire. The newly built Foundation preserves the idiosyncratic arrangement he designed at the mansion where it used to be housed, and resting on tables under some of the Renoir paintings are earthenware dishes fashioned by Renoir fils. Pottery was Jean’s art prior to film.

The River shows tonight at 7:10 pm and tomorrow at 5:00 pm.

Posted in Books, Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Mother, Daughter, Me, and Katie Hafner

A couple weeks ago, the Cleveland Plain Dealer printed my review of Katie Hafner’s new memoir Mother, Daughter, Me. I pitched it to the PD because the mother-daughter angle interests me, and, as it turned out, Katie and I have more in common than I suspected. Her mother is tactless and frequently unkind and was blatantly neglectful during Katie’s childhood. With the editor’s encouragement, I began the review with a more personal comment than one usually does in a newspaper review, echoing my blog post about Mother’s Day this year.

After you read my review, copied below, tell me this: How do you manage the expectations raised by holidays, by media, by Facebook? How do you resist comparing your real, lived, imperfect life to the way it spozed to be?

MOTHER_DAUGHTER_ME_.JPGRandom House, 268 pp., $26

Mothers’ Day was tough for me this year, and the reason was Facebook. All those postings praising Mom as so understanding, so supportive, so loving! My mom was distant, acerbic, and possibly mentally ill, and I could never have written her such unabashed fan mail.

Many of us, in fact, have had challenging relationships with our mothers, some of whom suffered from addiction, mental illness, or other problems. New York Times writer Katie Hafner’s new memoir, “Mother Daughter Me,” describes managing an adult relationship with such a mother, while trying to be a good mom herself.

Hafner’s mother was more like Mommie Dearest than Marmee. “When she drank,” Hafner recalls, “she grew mean. She would emerge from her bedroom once or twice a day, looking bloated and terrible, to rail about something.”

After overdosing on pills and booze, Helen (as Hafner calls her here) lost custody of her two daughters.

So you might wonder why Hafner invited Helen, then 77, to move in with her and her teenage daughter, Zoe, in 2009. Blithely confident that she’s forgiven her mother, Hafner writes, “I believed we were as close to the mother-daughter ideal as two women could be. We often spoke several times a day. I confided everything to her. I told myself I had long since put any lingering anger about my childhood behind me, that I had taken the ultimate high road.”

Moving into their new house, however, Hafner finds herself raging over whose kitchen utensils, hers or her mother’s, should go into the drawer. Turns out she’s still a tiny bit angry after all.

Moving gracefully back and forth in time, Hafner describes her mother’s difficult childhood and marriage. She covers her own misfortunes as well, including her husband’s fatal heart attack at the age of 45, which helped forge a tight bond between Hafner and her daughter, making grandmother Helen a third wheel. Helen’s tactlessness doesn’t help. Soon after the move, her blunt criticism of Zoe’s cello playing causes Zoe to quit the cello and harbor a resentful teenage grudge thereafter.

Hafner’s stuck between them, like so many middle-aged folks today — navigating Zoe’s stormy adolescence and Helen’s blustering, while contending with her own turbulent emotions. As tensions grow, Hafner wisely seeks therapy for herself and her mom, discovering that Helen has no memory of the traumas she caused.

Even after apologizing for past mistakes, Helen continues to drop bombshells, accusing Hafner, for example, of coveting her money. In the course of the book, Helen sells off her treasured Steinway piano, instead of leaving it to her daughter and granddaughter as she had promised. Hafner’s tolerance for her mom’s invective often seems unhealthy, and subjecting her daughter to Helen’s vitriol is even more mystifying.

In the end, thankfully, they decide to separate. Once more, Hafner feels forgiving: “[My mother] can look her past mistakes square in the eye and express contrition in a way that also makes her daughter feel something approaching unburdened love, even pride.”

I have my doubts. Hafner was fooled before, by those intimate phone conversations, and she could well be thinking wishfully now.

Hafner’s unrealistic expectations may derive from early childhood, when, she writes, “My longing for her was always there. What I wanted more than anything was my mother’s attention.” Such unmet needs haunt many mothers and daughters, and Hafner is brave to confront her mom’s failures as well as her own. The idealized moms of Mother’s Day are more often fiction than fact.


 

Posted in Books, BPD-Related, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Two Sweet Movies

I’ll limit my Cinematheque recommendations this week to the one film I’ve already seen–Kolya, a Czech Academy-Award winner from 1996.

Frequently, it seems, the foreign-film Oscar goes to the most sentimental and accessible of the candidates, i.e., the “heartwarming” one. Kolya fits that description, but transcends its predictability with humor and charm. It has appealing performances by the Russian five-year-old boy adopted unexpectedly by the grumpy, womanizing bachelor musician with the unforgettable face, played by Zdenek Sverak, the director’s father.  Tonight at 7:35 pm; Saturday at 5:15 pm.

The Cleveland Museum of Art shows a Miyazaki animated film tonight, From Up on Poppy Hill, directed not by Hayao Miyazaki, though, but by his son Goro.  It looks to be a gentle, beautiful family drama. Tonight at 7:00 pm and Sunday at 1:30 pm.

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment