My Parents’ Bookcase

 

James Agee

I’m reading a book called Chaplin and Agee: The Untold Story of the Tramp, the Writer, and the Lost Screenplay by John Wranovics. I have some interest in film and in Charlie Chaplin that’s rubbed off from my film-buff husband.  James Agee–film critic, novelist, and poet– is in my pantheon. Putting these two together makes for a book that interests me.

Near the end of his life, Agee saw a dream come true when, in 1947, he met and soon became friends with Chaplin, one of his heroes. He called Chaplin the greatest living artist in any medium, which, when you consider the time in which they were living, is awesome praise. Chaplin, to Agee, was a greater artist than James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, Pablo Picasso, or Ernest Hemingway. Agee, himself a highly regarded film critic for Time and The Nation, had already published his great eccentric journalistic study of poor cotton farmers, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, but, in getting to know Chaplin, began rubbing shoulders with more luminous luminaries, such as Gene Kelly, Dorothy Parker and a young Norman Mailer.

All this has little to do with what I want to write about. It’s still going to take me a while to get there.

In order to move to California, with the hope of someday working with Chaplin, Agee contracted with Life magazine to write two Hollywood-oriented articles. One became Comedy’s Greatest Era, a seminal essay on the silent comedians, paying tribute to Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, and Harry Langdon. The other was a profile of the director John Huston, with whom he also became friends. Agee ended up writing much of the screenplay of Huston’s movie The African Queen.

Agee had his first heart attack (the second would kill him two years later, at the age of 44) while working with Huston. While he was recovering, Peter Viertel took over The African Queen script and later wrote a novel based on working with John Huston, the unflattering White Hunter, Black Heart.

Now we’re there.

That title took me back, all at once, to my parents’ bookcase, circa 1965. I can picture the spine of that book through the glass door, wrapped in a jungle-y green paper cover. ($155 now on Amazon.) Sadly, though, I can’t picture the books on either side of it. I can’t identify them unless by some unlikely turn of events I run across those forgotten titles in some other book or article about the last century.

I wish I’d taken a snapshot of those book shelves. They spoke to me of my parents’ lives, their educations, the eras which formed them, and their friends. Most of the books, I think, were gifts, and others, old books, dated from when they were in school. I can recall some titles, of course. Mark Schorer’s biography of Sinclair Lewis, An American Life. Betty MacDonald’s The Egg and I. Lincoln Steffins’ autobiography.  It All Started with Columbus and its sequels by Richard Armour, whose humor my dad was fond of. All of these I too read at some point. The Readers Encyclopedia, a reference book by William Rose Benet (brother of the poet Stephen Vincent Benet) , sat in a place of honor and convenience on the mantle, referred to frequently as my parents pored over the Double-Crostic in the Saturday Review which arrived in our mailbox every week.

My dad earned a journalism degree from Ohio State in about 1934. He liked to read, and he read interesting books, but he disliked high-falutin’ things and suspected eggheads, as he would have called them. My mom had a Masters degree in French history. The two of them watched College Bowl (hosted by Allen Ludden, Betty White’s husband) every week and enjoyed competing with the nerdy college kids who appeared there.  They read lots of magazines. They weren’t intellectuals, because they didn’t regard themselves as intellectuals. But they represent to me the way lots of college-educated people were back then. They read, and they assumed a certain body of knowledge about literature and history. They could recite lines from Longfellow from memory and could name English monarchs. They smoked. They ordered cocktails when they went to restaurants—a martini for my dad and a Manhattan for my mom.

I used to gaze at that bookcase a lot. I don’t wish I’d kept all the books, exactly, but I do wish I had a picture, so that I could occasionally pick out a title and request it from the library. I want to preserve that mid-20th-century sensibility, which I have so much trouble putting into words. The bookcase and its contents are gone; they remain only fragmentarily in my memory, and my sisters’, many steps removed from my kids’ experience. They’re gone, like the Cold War and the blacklist, the ash trays around our living room, our old dog Abbie, and my parents Martin and Eleanore.

 

 

Posted in Books, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Your Weekend Plans

This weekend you can have your mornings and afternoons to yourself. Your evenings belong to me. The Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque offers stellar movies for your enjoyment.

Day-Lewis as Christy Brown

I thought My Left Foot (1989) might have been the first film where I saw, and was dazzled by Daniel Day-Lewis, but I was mistaken. Before that film, for which he won the first (of three, so far) Oscars for Best Actor, I saw him in My Beautiful Laundrette and A Room with a View (both in 1985) and the unforgettable The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1988), all of which you should try to see right now, today, if you haven’t already. He had also appeared in other films and TV shows, too, which you might remember if you’re more on top of things than I am.

Christy Brown (1932-1981)

In My Left Foot, Day-Lewis plays Christy Brown, the Irish author and hero of the book by the same name. The author’s left foot merits the title, because it’s the only part of the body he can control, due to cerebral palsy. With that foot, Brown wrote his autobiography and also painted pictures, more than most of us accomplish with four working appendages. I read the book around the same time as my dad, a paraplegic with a special interest in the subject matter. I remember feeling it was a pretty adult book with some scandalous parts, and I felt grown up reading it along with my dad. My memory is that the inspiration is leavened with a little Celtic bawdiness, but that was a long-ago, innocent time.

It’s a great story, with an Oscar-winning performance, too, by Brenda Fricker. One should not pass up chances to see Daniel Day-Lewis. (July 11 at 6:00 pm; July 13 at 7:25)

Your second movie of the weekend is Ginger and Rosa, a lovely, recent coming-of-age story set in 1962, starring Elle Fanning in a very impressive performance (nailing an English accent), directed by Sally Potter. Annette Bening and Oliver Platt also star. Two devoted teenage friends become estranged, as one grows concerned with nuclear disarmament and the other  with boys, and then with a particular, particularly inappropriate, man. Loved this when I saw it at the Cedar-Lee. (July 11 at 8:05 pm; July 12 at 9:40 pm)

Jason fighting skeletons

Last but absolutely not least is Jason and the Argonauts, the eminently enjoyable 1963 epic with dazzlingly wonderful special effects by the legendary Ray Harryhausen, who died in May. He appeared at the Cinematheque 20 years ago and was charming and disarming and gracious. See this movie and hear Bernard Hermann’s fine music where they belong, in a theater. Bring the kids. (July 12 at 5:15; July 13 at 5:15)

I can’t give a personal testimonial about the weekend’s other offering, but it sounds good. Something in the Air  (a weird translation of the French title, Apres Mai) takes place after the student uprisings in Paris in 1968 and depicts young people finding their places in that highly charged, radically changing world. This recent offering by director Olivier Assayas was well received at last year’s New York Film Festival. (July 12 at 7:20 pm; July 13 at 9:30)

There you go. Weekend plans made, and you have Sunday free to relax, or post here about how you liked the movies.

Posted in Books, Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lunatics and Laughs

Federico Fellini’s last film, The Voice of the Moon  (1990), shows this Saturday at 5:15 pm at the Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque. Crazily, this movie was never released in the U.S. It’s so odd that Americans had no way to see this film by one of the great directors till now, even though it got superlative reviews and won tons of awards. It looks to be a surreal, Fellini-esque (go figure), comic exploration of modern society and metaphysics, in which three lunatics (literally) capture the moon. Roberto Benigni stars.

James Franco, unrecognizable

Other offerings this weekend are similarly intriguing. No, starring the always appealing Gael Garcia Bernal, is the only film I’ve already seen. It depicts the real-life ad campaign to oust Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1988. It’s fascinating,  disturbing, and often funny. Those adjectives probably also apply to Spring Breakers, starring Selena Gomez and a creepy James Franco, complete with cornrows and gold teeth. All the film’s performances have been praised. No screens Friday (tonight) at 7:30 pm; Spring Breakers is tonight and tomorrow at 9:50 pm.

A Serbian comedy called The Parade rounds out the weekend. Macho veteran soldiers from Yugoslavia’s former republics are compelled, despite their homophobia, to provide security for a gay pride parade. It sounds like it will provide some politically incorrect laughs, tonight at 5:15 pm and Saturday at 7:35 pm.

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Insights from Book Group

Some people question the purpose of book groups. I’ve had people (mostly men, to be honest) ask,

A pretty good choice

“What’s the point? Why not just read the book? Who really cares what anyone else thinks?”

Most everyone, however, can comprehend at least a few book group benefits. It’s social. It’s friendship. It’s, sometimes, good food and wine! Moreover, it’s a means to share a common interest. If you love books and reading, it’s fun–not for everyone, but for some of us–to explore that passion with others.

Discussing books (and movies and other arts) also challenges one’s own thinking. Hearing others’ reactions to a book can open your mind, maybe drive you crazy, perhaps raise questions about your own opinions. In any case, being forced to verbalize your thoughts can be a bracing challenge. It may cause you to clarify your values, as we used to say in the ’70’s. Your idiosyncratic tastes may heretofore have gone unrecognized, even (or especially) by yourself.

For example (you knew there was an example, didn’t you?), I’m realizing more clearly why I read and what I look for in a book. It’s not content. I usually don’t care what a book’s about, although,of course, I often read non-fiction because I’m interested in the subject matter. I read a lot about borderline personality disorder, for instance, when I was researching the topic, first, for my own exploration, and then for my book. Even with non-fiction, though, I’m often reading for reasons other than subject matter. I read and loved The Hare with Amber Eyes by Edmund de Waal, even though I knew nothing of netsuke–little Japanese sculptures–and not much about Japanese culture in general. I found him and his storytelling fascinating, and that’s all it took.

I like being surprised. (Notice I didn’t say shocked. Though that’s okay sometimes.) Canada, Richard Ford’s recent epic novel, surprised me. At every turn, I didn’t know what was going to happen, even though he gives away the ending in the first sentence. Beyond the plot, though, I’d never read anything like that book. It’s in two big, very different sections. It’s artfully narrated by an older man who tells the story from the point of view of a young boy. How does a writer convey both those sensibilities a the same time? It’s fully of irony and doubt and moral ambiguity. You can’t summarize it in twenty-five words or less.

I’ve learned from my book-group discussions, also, that I don’t care very much about liking the characters. Canada’s characters are not particularly likeable. Neither were Claire Messud’s in her troubling new novel The Woman Upstairs. I was struck by this passage from the Irish novelist Colm Toibin’s recent book of critical essays called New Ways to Kill Your Mother:

The novel is not a moral fable or a tale from the Bible, or an exploration of the individual’s role in society; it is not our job to like or dislike characters in fiction, or make judgements on their worth, or learn from them how to live. We can do that with real people and, if we like, figures from history. They are for moralists to feast on. A novel is a pattern and it is our job to relish and see clearly its textures and its tones, to notice how the textures were woven and the tones put into place. This is not to insist that a character in fiction is merely a verbal construct and bears no relation to the known world. It is rather to suggest that the role of a character in a novel must be judged not as we would judge a person. Instead, we must look for density, for weight and strength within the pattern, for ways in which figures in novels have more than one easy characteristic, one simple affect. A novel is a set of strategies, closer to something in mathematics or quantum physics than something in ethics or sociology. It is a release of certain energies and a dramatization of how these energies might be controlled, given shape.

Toibin, whose warm and accessible novel Brooklyn, by the way, bears little connection to quantum physics, may be overstating it a smidge. In general, though, he’s saying what I often think. Who, after all, likes Lady Macbeth or even Hamlet? Who likes Ahab or the Wicked Witch of the West or Humbert Humbert? We don’t have to like them to be grateful to their creators.

Thankfully, my book groups are not all about me and my tastes, but they help me clarify and understand my tastes, at the same time they allow me to consider other people’s preferences. After a book group discussion, I often understand myself, my friends, and the book at hand a lot better. There’s also all the laughing.

What about book groups? What’s the point? If you’re in one (or two), why? If not, why not?

 

 

 

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Case for Buster

From “The Goat,” 1921

Some people don’t like black-and-white films. Others hate subtitles. I feel both kinds of people are missing out and should give such cinematic variations a better chance. I also know, though, there’s no accounting for taste and that everyone doesn’t have to like what I like.

Silent films fall into the same category. I fear some people got it into their heads, way back, that silents are primitive, inferior steps on the way toward our contemporary sophisticated art form. (You know, like Fast and Furious, Part 6.)  The same people may have a “progress” orientation to other arts, assuming that modern plays and books are better than older, primitive ones. This is nutty and misguided to me. Just as older, even ancient writers are as “good” as current ones (though not necessarily better), so too can old movies be as artful, interesting, profound, and/or funny as modern ones. Maybe those jerky, black-and-white TV versions of old silents ruined them for many viewers.

Some may feel, then, that Buster Keaton comedies are old-fashioned, herky-jerky slapstick. But, in my opinion, Buster Keaton was a genius. He was an awesome acrobat and stuntman–all those “tricks” are real. He’s really jumping between moving cars and dangling from rooftops and taking dangerous falls; he had the broken bones and long-standing injuries to prove it. He’s also smart and witty.

In a short film I saw last week, for example, someone drops a banana peel on the sidewalk, just as Buster is being pursued by the authorities. The first couple passersby do not slip on it, and you think, “Oh, clever. We have to wait for awhile for someone’s pratfall.” Then more and more people run by, but nobody slips on the banana peel. It’s a throwaway gag, but effective and funny, and sophisticated in its way.

Perhaps my favorite moment in last week’s program was at the beginning of the first short film, The High Sign. Buster swipes a newspaper from somebody’s pocket and sits down to read the want ads. He unfolds the newspaper, once and then twice, contending with the large piece of newsprint outdoors in the breeze–a familiar experience to most of us. Then, absurdly, he unfolds the paper again and again, ending up with a giant sheet of paper bigger than he is, tangling around him in the wind, while he flails at it to escape, ripping it to shreds in the process. It’s just a tiny, brilliant bit of business.

These are mere moments amid manic pursuits, myriad sight gags, and even touching scenes. There’s plenty more in this weekend’s offering of four Keaton shorts at the Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque, Thursday at 5:45 pm and Friday at 7:15 pm. The whole program lasts only 83 minutes.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Buster and Fritz

Whenever I get a chance to recommend Buster Keaton, I recommend Buster Keaton. This weekend, I recommend Buster Keaton at the Cleveland Cinematheque.

Over the next four weekends, you can see Buster Keaton short films. Tomorrow evening (5:15 pm), three from 1920 and 1921 are playing: “The High Sign,” “One Week,” “Convict 13,”  and “The Scarecrow.” I’ve seen “One Week,” in which Buster builds, or tries to build, a pre-fab house, and it’s very funny. You can see him try to attach the chimney here.  I don’t think I’ve ever been disappointed in a Keaton film.

On Sunday at 10:00 am (yes, that’s right), head over to the Capitol Theatre for a very different experience: Fritz Lang’s chilling 1931 classic, M. It manages to be chilling and humane, all at the same time.

 

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Three for the Show

This weekend, abbreviated because of the holiday, offers only three movies, all of them good bets.

Setsuko Hara

You can see Ozu once again, as part of the Cinematheque series Marriage a la Ozu, in the 1957 family drama Tokyo Twilight. Less gentle and less benign than other offerings from this Japanese director, it’s also long at 141 minutes. It stars two Ozu favorites: Chishu Ryu and Setsuko Hara. Friday at 9:35 pm and Saturday at 5:00 pm.

The Girl (Friday 5:30 pm; Saturday 7:40 pm) touches on today’s headlines. It tells the story of a woman helping smuggle Mexicans across the border into the U.S. She gets more involved that she intended when she has to take responsibility for a six-year-old Mexican girl. Reviewed here.

Lore chronicles the escape of five (fictional) German children, whose Nazi parents are arrested at the end of World War II, through their devastated country. This film garnered great reviews when it came out last year. It plays Friday at 7:25 pm and Saturday at 9:35 pm.

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Belatedly

I’ve been remiss re the Cinematheque. Sometimes I’m not enthusiastic about any of the films, but I’m writing now, because I can be excited about a couple offerings.

It’s Yasujiro Ozu again, this time 1956’s Early Spring. (Late Spring, Mid-Winter, Fall Equinox–write your own Ozu-of-the -Similar-Title joke.) This one’s a tad steamier than most, using adultery as a theme and starring the estimable Chishu Ryu, like many Ozu films. I haven’t seen this one, but Ozu rarely disappoints. If you like sedate, black-and-white restraint. Saturday at 5:00 pm; Sunday at 8:40 pm.

The Kid with a Bike (Friday, 7:30 pm) also looks good. A Belgian film, made in 2011, it concerns a young boy, abandoned by his family, who’s adopted by a hairdresser. It’s gotten great reviews.

I did see Caesar Must Die a few months ago, an interesting Italian adaptation of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, adapted and performed by inmates of a high-security prison. The violent pasts and turbulent psyches of the performers reveal themes of the play, and the amateur prison performers are powerfully good. This is a film as much about prison reform as it is about Shakespeare. It shows Saturday at 7:45 pm and Sunday at 4:30 pm.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mother’s Day

This Mother’s Day made me feel sad. Our family’s last grandmother, my step-mother-in-law Grace, died last year. Also, the news all around us conveys so much grief for and about mothers—Sandy Hook, Boston, and now Cleveland’s horrendous news of abducted and abused daughters. Happily, these Proserpinas have returned to their families, but how much horror there is for them to process, and us, too, at one remove.

Reading Mother’s Day tributes leaves me feeling ambivalent at best, because most of what is said I couldn’t really say about my mom. Today Joanna Connors in the Cleveland Plain Dealer salutes those three girls’ mothers (and the perpetrator’s, to whom she’s generously compassionate), as well as her own mother. She extols a mother’s self-sacrifice (“This is the bond. This is the strength. This is the hope”), and all I can think is, Not my mom.

My mother couldn’t have supported and campaigned for me and my sisters like the dogged mothers Joanna writes about. She may have felt for us. She may have grieved when we were sad or suffering. But she couldn’t demonstrate these feelings, and she didn’t have the wherewithal to help us much.

I used to winnow through the drugstore’s selection of Mother’s Day cards to find one expressing some attenuated affection that didn’t downright lie. I can’t post a Mother’s Day encomium on Facebook. I can’t laud her steadfastness and love.

My mom did, however, help make me who I am, for better or worse. So I can quote here the Mary Oliver poem I use for the epigraph to my book Missing: Coming to Terms with a Borderline Mother.

 

                                    Someone I loved once gave me

                                        A box full of darkness.

                                   It took me years to understand

                                       That this, too, was a gift.

 

Posted in BPD-Related, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Ozu Once Again

Ozu’s “A Hen in the Wind”

This weekend at the Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque I recommend 1948’s A Hen in the Wind (Sat. 5:15 pm; Sun. 6:30 pm) based on its director Yasujiro Ozu, who made such great Japanese classics as Late Spring and Tokyo Story. It sounds like a sad one–a woman prostituting herself to care for her child–but is probably subtle, sensitive, and wrenching.                          

Paul Thomas Anderson’s dad

I didn’t see The Master when it came out. Maybe you did, or at least you heard all the encomia for Joaquin Phoenix, Amy Adams, and Philip Seymour Hoffman, as well as for the direction by Paul Thomas Anderson, who also wrote the script. Anderson has special relevance to us Clevelanders, especially Cleveland baby-boomers, who remember his dad Ernie’s Ghoulardi character and show. In the mid-sixties, Ghoulardi wore goofy makeup and performed outrageous schtick between segments of horror movies on local TV. He’s a legend.

Anyway, The Master received ho-hum reviews when my husband saw it. He’s showing it to give it a second chance. I’d love to know what you thought, if you saw it, and whether you want to see it again. If so, the Cinematheque gives you another chance Saturday at 7:00 pm and Sunday at 3:30 pm. Critics and viewers who were not my husband gave this film rave reviews.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment