Another Kind of Missing

I’ve often wondered if people would have children if they actually comprehended the length and depth of the commitment. Before I had kids, I sort of thought that at age six, you patted them on the head and sent them off to school with a sigh of relief. Your job was just about over at that point.

Maybe I thought this because I had a somewhat inattentive mother. Maybe I just didn’t observe the world around me. I realized that some mothers stayed involved in their kids’ lives, but I thought they were kind of strange. My loving mother-in-law was great, but, really, did she have to call so often and ask so many questions?

As my kids passed that school-age milestone, the realization crept up on me: it would never end. Never. I would always be their mom, and I would always care way too much. By that time, of course, Nature has captured you and made you do her bidding, and it’s too late.

This evening I was out walking, almost home, when I ran into my neighbor, just beginning her evening stroll. Our grown daughters attended high school together and have both, now, moved out of town. We stopped and chatted about our book group’s selection Push by Sapphire (which became the movie Precious) — a story of a mother and daughter, when you think about it. (Only…yikes.) We talked for awhile and then parted, both of us worried about getting home before the clouds above us opened up.

As she turned, my neighbor gestured to her windbreaker. “It’s my daughter’s,” she said, smiling. “She left it here when she moved to Chicago.”

“Yeah. I wear one of Margaret’s sweatshirts all the time,” I laughed.

When I turned away, I heaved a huge sigh and had to blink the tears from my eyes. There it is, right at the surface. Missing her. My adult daughter. It will never end.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Back to School

I started back to school on Monday and had a very good day. My Latin students were all pleasant and cooperative and would that we all remain that way. This positive attitude generally precedes the introduction of indirect objects, principal parts of verbs, and the second declension (“What?? There’s more than one??”)

For the second year in a row, a couple of new students have explained they’re taking Latin because Spanish was too hard for them. This is not good news for me.

Still, it’s all very promising, as new school years always are, and I’m meeting more new classes tomorrow for the first time.

My summer reading, counting from June (though I also had much of May off), amounts to thirty-seven books, with fifteen in August alone. It needs to be pointed out that my August reading included a number of children’s books, including the whole Little House on the Prairie series —  an epic classic, in my opinion. Along the lines of the racial stereotyping I’ve been writing about, there’s a creepy minstrel show near the end, in which Pa takes part.

My book group book for August — Push by Sapphire (basis for the movie Precious) — made a stunning contrast to the Little House books which would be funny if it weren’t so awful

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wilder Indians

After reading and blogging about two of my old Weekly Reader Book Club books (here and here), I moved on to another children’s book that I knew made reference to Native Americans. I never read Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House books as a child, but I read the whole series to my children and loved them. As I picked them up again, I realized we had read them through only once, almost twenty years ago, so rereading them now is full of pleasurable surprises.

First, though, to get the Indian thing out of the way. Laura’s Ma hates and fears Indians. Pa views them as human beings and always tries to see things from their point of view, and Laura clearly favors her dad’s perspective.

Recreation of Ingalls family cabin in Kansas

Still, the image LIW presents is often painfully stereotypical. In The Long Winter, sixth in the series, an elderly Indian man warns the settlers about the harsh weather before them. It’s a real mix. He’s wise, his prophecies come true, and Pa so takes his warnings to heart that he moves his family into town. At the same time the old Indian represents that mysterious savage wisdom and actually says the words, “Heap big snow.” In short, the portrait of Native Americans in these books is certainly more humane and sympathetic than in many — probably ahead of its time — but still problematic by our standards.

Underlying all this ambivalence is our understanding that these admirable pioneers — the Ingalls and Wilder families — were displacing the native people. While we’re rooting for Pa to homestead successfully, we’re also aware of the great historical genocide this settlement caused.

In spite of that realization, I love these books. Ms. Wilder (and/or her daughter Rose, who some people think actually wrote them) creates a coherent, tactile world peopled with complex characters. I’ve loved this summer reading (about to start Little Town on the Prairie, the second to last of the series) and will hate to see it end. I’ve been telling everyone that the series is an epic masterpiece.

Is this opinion morally tenable? Should my recognition of what happened to Native Americans ruin my enjoyment of the Little House books? Should Fagin and Shylock spoil Dickens and Shakespeare for us? How far does a reader go to excuse bigotry and stereotypes as typical of their time?

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Martha and Me

I have mastered the muffin.

I always made okay muffins…sometimes a little chewy, sometimes a little small. Now, now, after viewing Martha making blueberry muffins and copying her recipe, I have made a big batch of delicate, delicious muffins for a picnic tomorrow.

Here’s what I learned. Apparently, I always took the usual recipe precaution “don’t over-beat” and “beat just until mixed” too literally. I was shocked at how long Martha beat the batter while adding the flour and milk to the butter-sugar mixture. I have been under-beating heretofore.

Next, Martha taught me to butter and flour the muffin tin. (I ran out of paper muffin cups, so I had to prepare the pans.) Duh. I know how much flouring the pan helps with cakes, but I never did it with muffins before. This time, no sticking! 

I used the ice-cream scoop trick to make the muffins uniformly (okay, similarly) sized.  Such a good Martha tip.

A generous sprinkle of a sugar and nutmeg mixture makes a nice crunchy topping.

Finally, I baked the muffins till they were brown. Usually I take them out too early, so that they’re done but not beautifully brown.

Voytko Farms in Aurora, Ohio

Also, I used blueberries frozen from a recent blueberry-picking trip with friends. So much better than your average frozen or grocery-store varieties. Martha also suggested shaking the berries with a tablespoon or so of flour before mixing them in the batter to prevent them from sinking to the bottom of the muffin. I forgot this step, but my blueberries did not sink.

I’m ready to try other varieties. Plain muffins. Rasberry muffins. Applesauce muffins. Coffeecake muffins. Strawberry muffins.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Re-Stigmatizing BPD

There’s been a little dust-up going on partly in response to my post Stigmas, Statistics, and Borderline, where I mentioned that the website BringChange2Mind, created by Glenn Close to help reduce the stigma of mental illness, leaves out personality disorders and focuses instead on depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and PTSD.

Some bloggers and readers who’ve encountered BringChange2Mind on Facebook have now been writing comments suggesting that BPD be included on the site. Though most are reasonable, I must say the aggrieved tone of some of them does not help dispel the stigma of BPD.

The stigma is an interesting topic for someone like me — a relative. A lot of my story has to be pretty dark, because having a mom with undiagnosed BPD is no picnic. Neither is having a child, sibling, or spouse with the disorder. In order to describe the disorder, we relatives have to reveal some bad things – reinforcing rather than dispelling the stigma.

On the other hand, my reading and research led me to an understanding of BPD as an illness, in which victim is no more responsible than a person with diabetes. I’ve also come to appreciate how deeply unhappy my mom was, which makes me less inclined to kick her around.

BPD is so stigmatized that people are still mostly unwilling to own up to it, which is bad for them and bad for society at large. (Dani Z, a brave young woman, has several YouTube videos about dealing with BPD.) Some therapists won’t even touch the diagnosis.

It’s a rock and a hard place. Though having a relative with, say, schizophrenia, can be tragic and wrenching, that relative is mostly wrestling with his or her own demons – who don’t usually come after you. But BPD is an emotional disorder, so it manifests itself in relationships. People with BPD may act like they hate you for no apparent (apparent to you, that is) reason. It’s hard to be empathetic with someone who rages and criticizes you all the time.

And very hard to talk about the relationship without promulgating the stereotype and re-stigmatizing the sufferer. What are your thoughts?

Posted in BPD-Related, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Far Frontier

So I pulled out another favorite Weekly Reader book that over the years I’ve muddled in my mind with Fear in the Forest (see previous post). Written by William O. Steele (illustrated by Paul Galdone), The Far Frontier takes place at the same time, during the early settlement of the Ohio territory. Wanting to disentangle it from the other book (all those “F’s”), I gave it a quick reread.

"Likely he's a-studying ants."

In this book, a boy gets apprenticed to an old naturalist improbably named Mr. Twistletree, who’s more interested in insects and leaves than the normal manly pursuits of huntin’ and shootin’. He wears spectacles and collects feathers and leaves. All the regular folk deride Mr. Twistletree for his eccentricity, useless book-larnin’, and general lack of aplomb.

As you might imagine, young Tobe, on their year-long journey into “Injun” country, comes to appreciate the man’s knowledge and abilities. By the end of the book, Tobe has decided to pursue some serious education and heads off for Philadelphy to study with Mr. T.

Along the way, the duo encounters some actual Indians, and I was curious to compare this incarnation with Ms. Leeuw’s in Fear in the Forest.

The Cherokee are fairly peaceful, but their cousins the Chickamaugas are cruel and uncivilized. They capture Tobe and his master. It looks bad, because everyone knows the Chickamaugas will kill you “in the cruelest way — rip out your fingernails, heap hot coals on your bare feet…” These Indians are portrayed, as in Fear in the Forest, as ignorant savages.

But there’s one redeeming, or almost redeeming, moment in this book. When Tobe calls the Indians “natural-born blackhearted and mean,” Mr. Twistletree demurs:

“Listen, Tobias. Whatever happens, I want you to remember this. Indians are no more black-hearted than other folks. The white men are their enemies, and with good reason, at least the Indians think so. Whites have stolen their lands; they have taken their hunting grounds; they have given them their diseases. There’s no place for the Indian to go. He can no longer find enough game to live on. He strikes out at the white man and his ways just as the rattlesnake strikes out at whatever he believes is menacing him. It is not you and me they hate and fear, Tobias, but whatever is new and strange. And that is the way with most men, expecially ignorant ones.”

Mr. Steele was doing okay up until those last couple sentences.

Was I harmed by this stereotyping? Was I wrong to overlook it and just enjoy the plot and adventure? The Far Frontier is leagues ahead of Fear in the Forest, but still not enlightened by today’s standards.

Along that line, here’s one more reflection on these two books. Much as I liked them, they moved me (aged about ten) to write a letter to the Weekly Reader folks suggesting that they choose more girl-centered books. Feminist in the making.

Posted in Books | 2 Comments

Fear in the Forest Redux

At Half Price Books a while back, I ran across a pristine copy of Fear in the Forest, an old Weekly Reader favorite of mine, complete with its original cover. I purchased it for $10.00 and intended to give it to my great-niece for her ninth birthday after rereading it myself. (I love the author’s name: Cateau De Leeuw. She grew up in Ohio. Leonard Vosburgh did the illustrations.)

My misgivings began with the first sentence of the Foreword: “There was only one way to make Ohio territory safe for the settlers and that was to defeat the Indians.”

In the next line appears the phrase “the savage foe.”

“Oops,” I thought, “I guess I don’t remember this book very well.”

Although I read Fear in the Forest a few times as a child, all I could remember after fifty years (yikes) was that Daniel, a young settler in the Ohio wilderness, feared Indians and then comes to grips with his fears. This time around, I hoped that Daniel would hate Indians at the start and then come to see them as regular people. It doesn’t happen. (Spoiler alert!) In the last few pages, a white woman dispatches an Indian with her rifle, and “Daniel suddenly found himself laughing. He did not know why.”

Daniel has an excuse to hate Indians — they murdered his father several years before. Still, it’s chilling to read the dismissive and hateful descriptions of Native Americans and their culture. At the same time, the corny pleasure of the dialogue and dialect, Daniel’s coming-of-age, the creepily threatening darkness of the wilderness, and wealth of pioneer lore made for an enjoyably nostalgic read…provided you ignore the bigotry.  

I’m not going to pass this book on to my niece. But why not?

The savage foe

I read it as a kid and saw hundreds of TV shows and movies where Indians were portrayed as red-skinned savages, and I turned out all right. I mean, I respect Native Americans, eschew offensive language, and never wear Chief Wahoo.

Was I harmed by Fear in the Forest and shoot-em-up Westerns? I’m not sure. Help me out here. How do we re-evaluate the politically-incorrect favorites of our youth?

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | 7 Comments

More Literary BPD!

 

Kirsten behaving herself

The sexually voracious Kirsten Munk (1598-1658), consort of King Christian 4th of Denmark, was terrified that, first, her lover Otto Ludwig would leave her, and then that she would lose her beloved handmaiden Emilia. She was incapable of empathy and showed no love for her children. She threw tantrums when things didn’t go her way and veered from profound love and devotion to bitter hatred when her significant others disappointed her.

Remind you of anyone?

I can’t testify to the historical truth, but it’s how Kirsten appears in Rose Tremain’s Music and Silence (1999), an August book-group selection. The sort of historical novel I don’t often read, it concerns the intrigues of the Danish court. I couldn’t help noticing Kirsten’s fear of abandonment, addictive personality, rages, lack of empathy, difficulty with being a mother, and dichotomous and distorted thinking — BPD symptoms all.

Kirsten’s strength and devious intelligence are almost admirable, but by and large she’s wickedly selfish and salacious. A Renaissance Alex Forrest.

There’s no hope — and no real humanity — in Kirsten. Which is another way of saying that identifying someone, even a literary character, as having borderline traits is usually stigmatizing.

Posted in BPD-Related, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Sarah Makes Up a Word

I don’t care much for Sarah Palin, but I love her new word “refudiate.” Jimmy Kimmel compares her to Don King — “She just makes words up!”

“Refudiate” is an example of a portmanteau, a blend of two words to make a new one.  Sarah couldn’t decide between “refute” and “repudiate,” so she just combined them! Examples with a little more traction are “smog,” “brunch,” “spork,” “multiplex,” and “Muppet.” Who knows? Maybe “refudiate” will catch on! It’s kind of brilliant.

“Portmanteau” is itself a portmanteau (just as “oxymoron” is itself an oxymoron), blending the French words for “carry” (porter) and “cloak” (manteau).  See a whole bunch of examples here. I just learned that they’re also called “centaur words.” How great is that?

Much as I love Sarah getting ridiculed, we’ve all done this inadvertantly, but not necessarily both in speech and in writing (in a Tweet), as she did. Sometimes I hear people say they’re “flustrated.”

Children create new combinations frequently. I often quote my niece Stephanie, who, begging to go home after an exhausting day at the Stark County Fair, complained she was “cowsick,” which isn’t precisely a portmanteau but is pretty close.

Any examples of your own to share?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Diagnosing at a Distance

Borderline personality disorder is alive and well on the internet these days, what with the shenanigans of Mel Gibson and Lindsay Lohan. Googling Mel and borderline just now, I found lots of links, including a diagnostic blog entry on the Huffington Post by a psychiatrist and author named Mark Goulston.

In Mel’s case, it’s the rage that caused me to make the connection; some online diagnosticians point to narcissistic personality disorder instead. Ms. Lohan’s major BPD symptoms are substance abuse and general emotional disintegration.

Celebrity with BPD?

This diagnosing at a distance interests me — looking at a person’s behavior at some remove and teasing out the symptoms, like scholars who theorize about Jane Austen’s final illness or wonder whether Abraham Lincoln suffered from depression, Graves disease and/or hyperthyroidism. People commonly assert that Princess Diana, Joan Crawford, and Marilyn Monroe were BPD sufferers. Also Mary Todd Lincoln!  Blogger Bon Dobbs speculates as well about Courtney Love, Amy Winehouse, and Britney Spears, among others.

One recent study maintains that Darth Vader suffered from BPD!

These speculations may seem both silly and unseemly, but I have to acknowledge that I’ve done the same thing. I’ve diagnosed my mother posthumously. As I was writing my book about my mom’s BPD, a little voice in my head kept whispering I wasn’t allowed to do this. I wasn’t a professional.

Interestingly, no expert who’s read the book has expressed any doubt about my “diagnosis.” I’ve received no negative feedback, thus far, on this point. I don’t know if that means my insights are correct or that I’ve stacked the deck.

What I know is that when I experienced the epiphany — connecting the disorder to my mom’s irrationality, unhappiness, and hurtfulness — it felt revelatory. It felt right. It helped me, ultimately and gradually, forgive her.

What do you think about diagnosing at a distance? Any other celebrity candidates? Naomi Campbell, anyone?

Posted in BPD-Related | 10 Comments