A Measure Going Out

A few years after my dad died and very soon after my childhood dog Abbie died, I stood in a bookstore and picked up Pilgrim at Tinker Creek by Annie Dillard. I read the book’s epigraph from Heraclitus and burst out crying.

It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living Fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out.

Another little measure went out on Monday, as we took our old, ailing dog to the vet for the last time. It’s such a strange reversal; you end his life after expending so much effort stoking the fire. It’s all up to you — food, water, medical care, grooming. We kept the fire going as long as we could, almost sixteen years.

But there came a slow, gradual decline. He lost his hearing and had trouble managing the stairs, and he went through some phases of wandering at night, seeming disoriented, and acting anxious about thunderstorms.

Then he became incontinent, and then things just got worse.

I can’t say anything special about him, except how much I loved him. He was the most ordinary dog. He barked at the mailman. He chased squirrels. He stuck his head out the window of the car. He greeted us at the door and licked our hands and sneaked food off the coffee table.

He did everything a dog is supposed to do, perfectly.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Books for Kids, Not

My sister-in-law Penni forwarded me an email that tells you what was happening in the year you were born. One fact struck me: Par Lagervist won the Nobel Prize for Literature that year. (I’m not saying what year that was. You can look it up.)

Par Lagervist

I hadn’t seen that name or thought of my buddy Par for many years, but he wrote a book I liked a lot when I was a kid, Barabbas, a novel about one of the thieves who was crucified next to Christ, according to legend.

This got me thinking about a few books I read as a child that were not intended for children. It’s not that I was precocious, but I had two older sisters who left books lying around, and my parents had lots of books that I’d pick up now and then. Barabbas wasn’t inappropriate in a sexual sense (or not that I remember), but it was dark and serious and spiritual.

A very different book but similarly adult in theme was A Dog’s Head by Jean Dutourd. I probably thought it was about dogs, but no. Here’s the Amazon description.

“Jean Dutourd’s A Dog’s Head is a wonderful piece of magical realism, reminiscent of Voltaire, Borges and Kafka. With biting wit, Dutourd presents the story of Edmund Du Chaillu, a boy born, to his bourgeois parents’s horror, with the head of a spaniel. Edmund must endure his school-mate’s teasing as well as an urge to carry a newspaper in his mouth. This is the story of his life, trials, and joys as he searches for a normal life of worth and love.” The New Yorker described it as “an excellent joke in the worst possible taste.”

Not exactly kiddie lit, in other words, and it did contain some sexual suggestion, as I recall. I probably didn’t catch all the connections with Voltaire, Borges, and Kafka.

I was fascinated by these books, I think, because I knew I wasn’t understanding them completely. I was intrigued by their sophistication. I’ve never reread either one as an adult, but maybe I will now.

Does this strike a chord? Can you remember reading and liking something as a child that you weren’t supposed to, for whatever reason?

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

What to Do

My July, especially the last week or so, has been taken up with senior dog care and vacillating over the decision as to what to do. People who say that your dog tells you when it’s time to end his or her life have much more communicative dogs than mine. Or better human radar. We don’t know what our dog is telling us.

On the downside, we’re dealing with incontinence and a weak and probably sore left rear leg. He needs to be washed off several times a day, which I assume he hates. He’s barely walking. And he’s deaf, which we have gotten used to by this point. He does some wandering at night, which results in his getting tangled in furniture; he wakes us up with his frustrated cries.

On the other hand, he still loves to eat. He’s still alert and still recognizes us and still seems to appreciate affection. During the intervals when he’s calmly resting or asleep in the living room, he seems (like a sleeping child) no trouble at all.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Love the One You’re With

I’ve named this phenomenon Compassion for the Other Person, meaning compassion for someone other than the person sitting in front of you.

This happens when you’re telling a friend about a hurt or a problem, and the friend explains what the other person probably intended. The person, that is, who’s not even there, the person who you think caused the hurt to begin with.

I run into this when talking about my mom. Some understanding friends express a lot of understanding of my mom, in reaction to one individual anecdote I’m sharing at that time. “She must have been doing her best,” they say. Or, “Gosh, I’ve done the same thing to my kids.” Or, “She probably didn’t mean it the way it sounded.”

They don’t understand that the one anecdote I’m sharing is emblematic of her mothering, that it’s a single component in a big pattern. In any event, I feel unheard.

I realize now that I’ve done this to other people. I have jumped to the defense of the mother, sister, friend, or husband — the one who’s not even there. And I have to admit that doing this made me feel magnanimous and insightful. Now I realize that I was overlooking the feelings of the person sitting in front of me, who should get first dibs on my compassion.

This frustration was a motivation for me to write Missing: Coming to Terms with a Borderline Mother. I wanted, once and for all, to get it all down in one place so that the syndrome, the pattern, the illness, was revealed. There’s “normal” parenting — a very wide spectrum of good and bad behavior. And then there’s behavior — day after day, month after month, year after year – that extends beyond normal boundaries.

Posted in BPD-Related, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Causes, Again

I’ve been reading How Dysfunctional Families Spur Mental Disorders: A Balanced Approach to Resolve Problems and Reconcile Relationships by Dr. David M. Allen, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center.

Dr. Allen asserts that drug companies and the rise of managed care have helped nurture the “brain disease” model for many disorders. Whereas autism, schizophrenia, and depression are clearly physical illnesses, disorders such as borderline personality are not, in Dr. Allen’s view. Personality disorders are traceable, he feels, to families–a natural outgrowth of abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional relationships in childhood. It has served the powers-that-be, however, to define these disorders as medical instead of psychological, and to treat them with medication rather than intense, time-consuming talk therapy and family counseling.

After reading my manuscript, Dr. Allen provided a thoughtful hypothesis explaining how my grandmother’s ambivalence may have contributed to my mother’s later depression and BPD symptoms. I have, heretofore, subscribed to the “biosocial” model, which assumes a significant biological propensity to the disorder, exacerbated by problems in the family.

I appreciate Dr. Allen’s maverick, uncompromising approach to assessing the causes of BPD and other disorders. I’m rethinking what I thought I knew about my mom and her parents. (I posted about this previously, here.) Reimagining your mother’s life, comprehending her childhood relationships and experience of her own parents, is a challenging matter. The difficulty helps me appreciate the courage and genius of novelists and playwrights–say, Eugene O’Neil in Long Day’s Journey into Night–who set out to portray their parents’ and grandparents’ lives.

Can you imagine your parents’ lives, especially before you came on the scene? What do you think you know for sure, and what remains a mystery?

Posted in Books, BPD-Related | 2 Comments

Splitting

Stacy Pershall

I’ve just finished a new memoir, Loud in the House of Myself: Memoir of a Strange Girl, by Stacy Pershall, who’s been diagnosed with both bipolar and borderline personality disorders. It’s a harrowing account of self harm and suicide attempts, miserable depressions, bullying, anorexia and bulimia, drinking, and drug use. At the same time, Pershall has an ironic sense of humor and some wise insights into her gnarled psyche. Her book puts you inside the disorder.

I was struck by her acute description of one of BPD’s hallmark symptoms. She’s comparing herself to her boyfriend’s old girlfriend, who’s demonstrably heavier than Pershall. But BPD, along with her anorexia, won’t allow her to acknowledge that she herself is the slimmer one. She says:

“Later I would find out that this sort of dissociation is common to borderlines, and that in fact there is a name for it: ‘splitting.’ For some reason, we have a uniquely difficult time seeing the world as anything other than black or white, ‘all good’ or ‘all bad.’ Incorporating both positive and negative beliefs about a person, including oneself, is largely impossible. We see ourselves and others in an all-or-nothing way: I was not just fat, but the fattest. Nobody else on the planet could possibly be fatter, and if units of measure said otherwise, the units of measure were wrong. Of all the things that go on in my head, this has always been the hardest to explain to so-called normal people, and by far the most painful aspect of the illness.”

I was impressed with Pershall’s astute insight and clear-headed description of the symptom. Later, though, I ran across an example of splitting that I’m not sure she was aware of herself. At this point in the book, her boyfriend Reese is breaking up with her. She writes:

“I remember he said, ‘I’m sorry,’ which of course the person dumping you never really is, or at least not enough that they’re willing to stay with you.”

This sort of remark makes me want to scream. Of course, someone can want to dump you and feel sorry about it at the same time! Most people probably do have these mixed feelings. For the person with BPD, though, it’s all one or the other. She is unable to tolerate ambiguity.

The struggle for us on the outside, as I keep saying, is to realize that the person with BPD can’t control their dichotomous thinking. It’s up to us resist the urge to scream, listen, and try to understand. Pershall’s vivid, honest book makes this easier to do.

Posted in Books, BPD-Related | Leave a comment

Phonemic Awareness, Etc.

One of my favorite writers, James Herndon, wrote this in How to Survive in Your Native Land (1971): “What stops you [from reading] is people teaching you skills and calling those skills ‘reading,’ which they are not, and giving you no time to actually read in the school without interruption.”

It always seems to me that people make education too complicated, with reading being a prime example. Experts, people with lots of letters after their names, assign numbers and levels and many polysyllabic words to such things as reading skills.

With all the folderol about skills, Herndon says, “No one has ever had much time in school to just read the damn books. They’re always practicing up to read.”

I feel so disengaged, so frustrated, so out of the loop when I’m plowing through articles about teaching and sitting at meetings about literacy. Other intelligent and well-meaning people apparently find all this stuff about value-added progress and alignment and meta-cognitive assessment interesting and helpful. I find it all complicated and unusable, and it makes me feel alienated, angry, and sad.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stigma Redux

I just finished reading Sara Gruen’s bestselling novel Water for Elephants. It’s an enjoyable read, and she did an impressive amount of research. It’s fun and dumb.

Thinking over the ending, I was reminded of my redemptive violence post. Since the novel’s closing scene appears at the very beginning of the book (and is repeated at the end), I won’t be ruining anything by saying that the villain meets a violent end — one that’s intended to be very satisfying. There it is. We smash in the head of the very, very bad man, and then we can all be happy. It’s an easy out for the writer. It panders to the reader.

This ending also connects to my previous posts about stigmatizing mental illness. The bad guy is explicitly identified as a paranoid schizophrenic. In fact, he has something of a dual personality — shifting from charm and good will to violent temper tantrums. Again, shouldn’t we feel compassion for a mentally ill person? Shouldn’t we want him to get help? By identifying him as mentally ill, isn’t Gruen implying that his evil acts are beyond his control?

Instead, she promulgates the stereotype that mentally ill people are violent. Then, instead of intimating that he’s at least deserving of some sympathy, she engineers a cataclysmic comeuppance for him. She makes certain that we feel empathy for the animal characters, but the human ones? Not so much.

Posted in Books, BPD-Related | Leave a comment

Half the Deed

Horace

I fixed the zippers on three pairs of pants yesterday, which had previously been held up by safety pins. (Possibly too much information, I know.) For months, I had contemplated picking up a zipper repair kit at Jo-Ann Fabrics. I recalled that my mom used to have such kits, but I didn’t know if they even existed anymore. When I finally made it to the fabric store, the nice lady directed me to a whole bunch of different kinds.

Once I had the kit at home, I was eager to try it. It’s not easy to take a zipper apart and put on a new slider, but I did it, and now I have three almost-new pairs of pants in my closet.

This gratifying experience reminded me of a favorite sentence in my classroom text, Wheelock’s Latin. In one of his odes, Horace wrote Dimidium facti, qui coepit, habet, which means He who begins has half the deed. I tell my students that tackling their translations and homework can be a formidable obstacle. Just open the book, I say, and gather some paper and a pencil. Once you’re sitting there with the book in front of you, starting your homework won’t be so hard. Don’t worry about finishing the task, just get started.

Another example is writing. We think we have to have an idea or know what we’re going to write. I found when I was writing Missing that all I needed to do was open the document. I may have been stalled for awhile, thinking I had to have to know ahead of time what I was going to say. Once I opened the document, though, and started browsing through it, I’d always find something to edit and add to, and then a couple of hours of writing would ensue.

Open the document. Make the phone call. Get out your textbook. Buy the zipper kit. Incipe, says Horace. Begin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Waiting for Godoprah

Samuel Beckett (1906-1989)

Yesterday I had an amusing point/counterpoint experience. I saw Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot for the first time. Then I watched the last episode of Oprah. Seeing these two back to back is enough to give you whiplash.

Nobody knows exactly what Waiting for Godot means, but everybody agrees it’s got something to do with futility, hopelessness, apathy, and human suffering. Oprah is not about those things. She is the antithesis of Waiting for Godot. Oprah’s farewell message was about hope, gratitude, empowerment, validation, and a few other words Beckett would never have thought of using in 1949.

Beckett’s characters are, above all, helpless. They wait, they’re indecisive buffoons, and they’re ineffectual. They can’t even successfully hang themselves from the tree adorning the nearly bare stage. Oprah, in contrast, was preaching effectuality. She was saying dreams can come true. She was saying you can do it if you try.

So they’re opposites thematically, but they also have something in common. People hate both of them. Oprah-haters find her sanctimonious, and playgoers often find Beckett pretentious and boring. Our show (a 1961 episode of TV’s “Play of the Week,” starring Zero Mostel and Burgess Meredith, at the Cleveland Museum of Art) yesterday had at least four walk-outs. I’m here to say, though, that you can like both Oprah and Sam. Oprah’s authenticity, philanthropy, and joie de vivre temper her preachiness, at least for me, and Beckett’s poetic genius and humor redeem his work’s dry patches.  

Finally, here’s why you really gotta love Oprah. Her website devotes a laudatory page to Waiting for Godot under the heading “10 Great Irish Writers,” another Beckett listing under “Five Books Everyone Should Read At Least Once,” and further reflections on Beckett from author John Edgar Wideman. In Oprah’s house, there are many mansions.

Share your thoughts about Oprah. Or Beckett.

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | 3 Comments