Thankfulness

I’m grateful for all the usual things. I’m lucky not to have to worry about clean water, cholera, mudslides, gang violence, political oppression, an adequate diet, and so on and on. Middle-class Americans are set apart from so much of the rest of the world in our good fortune. Closer to home, I appreciate my good health, my healthy family, my home, my dog, my friends, our jobs, and all the undeserved good fortune I’ve experienced.

Yesterday, though, I was giving some thought to a very specific object of my gratitude: the public library.

I stopped in to the Heights Main Library to return three books. Browsing among the new books, I picked up Michael Caine’s new memoir The Elephant to Hollywood and Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption. (She wrote the gripping Seabiscuit in 2001.) While I was there, I also explored the magazines and got the idea to take home some Christmas, 2009, issues of Oprah and Martha Stewart Living to check out decorating and craft ideas I will never use.

How awful it would be, I thought, if the libraries were to go away. What if the small-government people decide that libraries cost too much, and people just need to fork over their $ to buy all their books and further the capitalist cause? What if we all have to buy a Kindle and pay $10 or more for every book we want to read?  What will I do if the libraries go away?

Other things I like have gone away. We used to have three actual grocery stores — one large one and two smaller ones — within walking distance of our house. They have all closed. About a mile away, we had a shopping center with a terrific deli, a movie theater, a great stationery store (not an Office Max!) and lots of other cool shops. It’s been razed, and the big, bare field there now has been awaiting further development. The Cleveland Indians went away from our basic TV stations. Our neighborhood ice-cream shop and bargain movie house have gone away. Card catalogs have gone away. Telephone books have almost gone away.

If libraries went away, I wouldn’t now be reading Anthony Trollope’s The Eustace Diamonds. After viewing a BBC production of his novel He Knew He Was Right, I realized that Trollope, whom I always liked, had written a whole bunch of novels I’d never read. How lucky for me! There’s a whole shelf of Trollope at the Cleveland State Michael Schwartz Library at my fingertips.

What about you? What are you grateful for?

Posted in Books | 2 Comments

Helping, Once Again

For people with BPD, the glass is never half-full and rarely even half-empty: it seems there has never been anything in that glass, ever.

I remember suggesting to my mom a few times that we were a lucky family, compared to the least fortunate. We weren’t starving, we had savings. Wrong thing to say. I’d get a reproachful look and a comment about my lack of understanding. I know now that what my mom wanted was some affirmation of her feelings. She wanted some acknowledgment of her sadness.

My tendency, though, was to resist, to contradict. I feared that if I gave her an inch, her misery would grab hold of me and suck me in. I had to dig in my heels and resist: “No, no no! Everything’s not that bad!” We talked past each other.

Here’s a piece of advice I wish I’d had before she died — S.E.T., which stands for “support, empathy, truth.” This acronym now helps me respond more compassionately, by offering supportive and empathetic words before sharing my own truth. I should add that I often have to force myself to do this. It doesn’t come naturally, hence the need for the acronym.

So, the person with BPD might say, “Nobody loves me. Even you are not really there for me. I wait for your phone calls, and they never come. Nobody calls or cares.”

You resist (and it’s hard) the temptation to react defensively and to recount all the phone calls you’ve made, all the efforts to reach out, all the patience you’ve tried to show, all the calls and efforts and patience of others in her life. You don’t say those things.

Instead, you say, “I do care about you, and I’m trying to be there for you, like lots of your other friends and family. We’re sure to fail sometimes, but we’re trying, and we’re not going anywhere.” That’s support.

Then you might say, “It must be so hard to have these bad feelings. It’s really not fair that you have to suffer so much. I’m so sorry things are so bad for you.” That’s empathy.

Then, after some give and take, finally, you might say, “Sometimes it hurts when you don’t recognize the efforts I’ve made. I called and emailed you last week, and so did a couple of other friends.”

Your supportive statements may (may, I emphasize) make it easier for her to hear your “truth.” You’ve already soothed and softened the way. You’ve resisted the temptation to contradict, which only strengthens the borderline person’s inclination to hear that they’re wrong, always wrong.

Posted in BPD-Related | Leave a comment

Helping Someone with BPD

This morning I watched Dani’s video blog on borderline personality disorder and “object constancy,” that is, the difficulty BPD sufferers have with trusting in someone’s love when that person isn’t there. This provided lots of food for thought, but as I walked my dog later on, my mind wandered into other BPD-related territory. I resolved to ask Dani to post something about how family and friends could help their loved one with BPD.

I have already learned a little about this. As I say in Missing, my memoir about my mom’s BPD, I’m something of a slow learner. After running repeatedly headlong into a cement bunker trying to “help” (i.e., change) my mom and then my friend Nancy, I gradually came to understand the futility of my efforts. “You’ll never change her,” my husband used to tell me about my mom, but those words always glanced off me. I couldn’t take them in.

Codependents, Melody Beattie writes in Codependents No More, “think they know best how things should turn out and how people should behave.” They “feel responsible for other people.” They “eventually fail in their efforts” and become “frustrated and angry.”  Has Melody Beattie met me?

What I didn’t understand, of course, was that I was dealing with a mental illness, with an emphasis on “illness.” I wouldn’t presume to fix up a person with diabetes or try to ameliorate the symptoms of schizophrenia or clinical depression. We have come to know that these last two are in some manner physical diseases, caused by an interplay of genetics and environment. You can’t love or care people out of them. So, too, with BPD.

BPD presents a conundrum. People with BPD can often function and appear quite normal in their workplace and around their friends. The symptoms, in some cases, appear only in connection with significant others. The friend and daughter (in my case) is constantly kept off balance, because there’s no reconciling the normal, effective traits with the depressive, anxious, self-destructive ones. You’re lured into thinking that you can just cheer up or comfort your BPD friend or relative.

But you can’t. I used to try dragging my mom out of her isolation to restaurants or stores. She resisted. I gave my friend Nancy a Brian Regan cd (he’s a very funny comedian), thinking she would laugh and feel better. Suffice it to say, it didn’t “work.” I have also shared lots of books and music with her. When I listen to Respighi’s Ancient Airs and Dances, I think no one could listen to that music and stay depressed. I am mistaken.

You can’t shake the symptoms of BPD from a person who suffers from it. If you try, you’ll make yourself depressed and certainly resentful, because the other person is so damned uncooperative. Why don’t they just take your advice? Why don’t they go to a club or join a group or do something happy?

They don’t because they can’t, at least in this moment.

So does this mean you should simply give up? Let me know your thoughts on this, and I’ll post my own answer soon.

Posted in BPD-Related, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Waiting for Jonathan Kozol

I saw Waiting for ‘Superman’ today, the much-hyped documentary by Oscar winner Davis Guggenheim (An Inconvenient Truth). I was all set to defend the movie to my teacher friends who decry its anti-union sensibility, some of whom won’t even see it on that account.

Now, having seen it, I don’t feel much like defending it. I’m glad it was made, and I’m glad a lot of people will see how people in poverty have to struggle with lousy schools. I’m glad that the movie demonstrates that all kids can learn. I’m sorry, though, that the movie puts so much blame on teachers and teachers’ unions.

Call me crazy, but I really don’t think teacher tenure is the fundamental cause of our schools’ problems. That’s the conclusion many viewers will come away with. The film doesn’t show buildings falling down. It doesn’t show broken windows and stinking bathrooms.

Jonathan Kozol

I wish after seeing Waiting for ‘Superman,’ people would go directly to their local library or bookstore and pick up a book by Jonathan Kozol. He doesn’t think that raising test scores is the Ultima Thule of education, or that education’s highest purpose is to transform children into cogs in our economic system to ensure that the United States remains the Number One Country in the World.

“Instead of seeing these children for the blessings that they are,” he wrote in Ordinary Resurrections: Children in the Years of Hope, “we are measuring them only by the standard of whether they will be future deficits or assets for our nation’s competitive needs.”  Jonathan Kozol went on a fast “as [a] personal act of protest at the vicious damage being done to inner-city children by the federal education law No Child Left Behind, a racially punitive piece of legislation.”

He dares to write about the joy of learning and the exuberance of children, not just about lengthening school days and mandating uniforms. “Why not give these kids the best we have,” he writes, “because we are a wealthy nation and they are children and deserve to have some fun while they are still less than four feet high?”

Since 1967, Jonathan Kozol has written twelve books on poverty and education and has spent countless hours working with teachers and schools and speaking tirelessly on behalf of urban education. It makes me very sad that he’s not even mentioned, let alone interviewed in Waiting for ‘Superman.’  I’m afraid that Kozol’s brand of idealism and activism is passe.

Have you seen the movie? Are you boycotting the movie? I’d love to hear what you think.

Posted in Books | 5 Comments

Another Day…

…another marvelous CSU story.

This morning I went off on a tangent in Latin 201, telling my students I reread Crime and Punishment this summer and making some obscure connection between the Dostoevsky novel and our text, the Cupid and Psyche story from Apuleius’s The Golden Ass.

Bill said, “Funny you should mention that book. Crime and Punishment is why I’m here.”

Before recounting his explanation, let me tell you about Bill. In his fifties, he’s a good-looking, fit guy, with a blunt, blue-collar demeanor. He wears a baseball cap and jeans and runs his own painting business. He’s interested in medieval history and wants eventually to teach in a community college. He’s friendly and good-humored and plain-spoken, capable, conscientious, and down-to-earth.

“My wife and I were going to see Crime and Punishment at the Cleveland Playhouse a few years ago,” he explained. “I thought, ‘I haven’t read a novel in twenty-five years. Maybe I should read the novel before we see the play.’”

So Bill read Crime and Punishment. He couldn’t believe how good it was and even cried a little at the end when the faithful Sonya accompanies Raskolnikov to prison in Siberia. So then he read The Brothers Karamazov and loved it, too. Then he read The Adolescent and The Idiot and a couple more and loved them all. “He’s a great writer,” Bill says.

“I decided that I might want to do some more of this. Reading and studying. So I enrolled in college.” He continues to attend school full-time, look after his family, and run his business.

I wonder what it might mean to callow adolescents (I love them, but they’re callow) to sit in a class with Bill. He doesn’t pontificate as older students sometimes do, he doesn’t talk down to anyone, and he struggles with Latin conditionals and deponent verbs like everyone else. Just by being here, though, and by being himself, he sets an example.

He’s in college because he read Crime and Punishment. What book changed your life?

Posted in Books, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Superwoman Lives

Recently one of my CSU students invited me to sit in as she defended her Masters thesis. (I’ll call her K.) I had helped K. with some Latin translation last semester as part of her research but hadn’t seen her since.

K. was a memorable character. Beginning Latin in 2006 as a sophomore in her late twenties, she went on to take all the Latin she could get at CSU. At the same time, she was raising three kids as a single mom and working full time to support them.

She was a good student. She purchased flashcards that go along with our Wheelock Latin text and kept them wrapped in a rubber band in her purse. Whenever she was waiting for one of her classes to start, she’d pull out her vocab and review.

When she graduated, she decided to continue straight on with grad school. She had grown to love the academic life and resolved to pursue a Masters degree in medieval history.

So, amazingly, since 2006, this single mother of three had completed both her Bachelors degree and Masters degrees. In my experience, nobody completes these things on time. Everyone always needs an extension on her thesis writing. Not K.

So, when I walked into the conference room at about 1:00 for her thesis defense and greeted her, sitting at the long conference table chatting with a friend who’d also come to lend support, and I overheard the word “induced,” I said, “No. Don’t tell me.”

K. stood up. She was very pregnant. Since I’d seen her the previous semester, she’d gotten married. Now she was a pregnant mother of three, finishing grad school, and working full-time. I expressed admiration and awe.

 “Wait,” her friend said. “There’s more.”

 K. explained calmly that immediately after her thesis defense, she was heading to the hospital, there to have labor induced. She planned to have the baby around 5:00 pm that day.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

“Wounding, Destruction, Despair, Healing, and Love”

Millicent Monks gives new, horrifying meaning to the term “sandwich generation.” Her memoir Songs of Three Islands: A Story of Mental Illness in an Iconic American Family describes being caught between mentally-ill parents and a daughter with borderline personality disorder.

Monks herself has suffered from depression at some points in her life and much understandable rage. When her mother wasn’t neglecting her, she was insisting that Millicent had been poisoned from unpasteurized milk. In an obsession resembling Munchhausen by proxy, she had Millicent hospitalized and medicated over long periods of time. Her father, an alcoholic and sex addict, abandoned the family.

Then, in an unbearable irony, after Millicent had married the love of her life (Robert Monks, an attorney and business consultant) and seemingly escaped her parents, her daughter showed symptoms of mental illness — violent tantrums, irrationality — in very early childhood, and Millicent and her husband have continued to struggle with feelings of guilt, questions of responsibility, and their daughter’s rage and rejection.

After an initial diagnosis of schizophrenia, doctors settled on BPD for Millicent’s daughter, and Millicent has subsequently ascribed the same diagnosis to her mother. She was left alone with her mother, as I was, and I can relate to the confusion, loneliness, and anger Millicent experienced.

The “iconic family” of the book’s subtitle is the Carnegies; her maternal great-grandfather was Thomas Carnegie, brother of Andrew. Millicent has inherited islands (literally) and lives now off Maine in a large family complex, housing as many as sixty or so family members and in-laws and various step-relatives and ex-step-relatives, including her estranged daughter.

Songs of Three Islands wanders chronologically and spiritually; it veers too far into psychic phenomena and New-Agey jargon for my taste. But Monks’s take on BPD is clear and affirming, and because she loves her daughter, she tries mightily to skirt the stigmas.

P.S. At the risk of sounding hypercritical, I was puzzled by some odd editing. “Mourning doves” are mistakenly called “morning doves” several times, but not consistently; once, both spellings appear in the same paragraph. At another point, the word “morning” (i.e., the opposite of evening) is spelled “mourning.” Weird.

Posted in Books, BPD-Related | Leave a comment

The Sadder Face

Borderline personality disorder is a variable, hard-to-pin-down phenomenon. “These patients…are a heterogeneous group…Even the same patient will present with a wide variety of problems at different times,” says Arthur Freeman, editor of Comparative Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder. Another specialist, Robert G. Harper, describes patients as sometimes relatively pleasant, engaging, and responsive, while at other times depressed, sullen, confused, disorganized, angry, demanding, drug-seeking, or manipulative.

Sometimes people who know a little about the disorder (sometimes experts, too) sum it all up in simplistic terms — addiction, rage, childhood abuse, cutting — when not all (not even most) sufferers show all these symptoms. And no one shows them most of the time. It’s elusive, this disease, and often people with BPD don’t exhibit the symptoms much at all outside the home, outside of their closest relationships. It’s the significant others, along with the patient, who bear the brunt of this relationship disease.

Augusten Burroughs in his memoir A Wolf at the Table writes this about his dad: “I remembered thinking how, in the light of day out in the world, my father was just like anybody’s father. But as soon as I was alone with him again, Dad was gone and dead was there in his place. … I realized my father was two men – one he presented to the outside world, and one, far darker, that was always there, behind the face everybody else saw.” 

I always noted that my mother seemed cheerful around other people. When neighbors visited, she smiled and conversed and never betrayed her bitterness. At church, she was cordial, if distant, and in the nursing homes, the staff always told me and my sisters how pleasant and cooperative my mother was. We would exchange knowing and frustrated looks. Why did she save all of her bitterness and cutting remarks for us?

She behaved pleasantly and normally to outsiders and showed us her darker, sadder face.

Posted in BPD-Related | Leave a comment

Abuse as a Cause of BPD

Yesterday a friend and my sister and I attended an all-day seminar called Understanding Personality Disorders presented by Dr. Dennis A. Marikis and sponsored by the Institute for Brain Potential. I was amazed, being a teacher myself, at how well Dr. Marikis was able to hold our attention through six hours. He used PowerPoint adroitly (which many people don’t…have you noticed?) and interspersed movie clips illustrating the various disorders. He was funny and engaging and compassionate.

Being inclined to worry, though, I take note of things that might undermine the thesis of my book, that is, that my mom suffered from borderline personality disorder (BPD). My mom never cut or injured herself, she never tried suicide, she wasn’t abused (as far as we know), and she was not an addict. Sometimes, these very characteristics are cited as clear “markers” of the disorder. Coincidentally, I met up with an old high-school friend tonight who now works as a psychiatric nurse. When I told her about my theories about my mom, she immediately began describing young people with BPD cutting themselves and attempting suicide and suffering abuse.

It doesn’t take much to make me feel insecure, even though at the same time I paradoxically feel very confident in my new understanding of my mom. When I analyze carefully, I can make the case that the conventional thumbnail sketch of BPD — which includes abuse, rage, addiction, and self-harm — is inaccurate or incomplete.

In this post, I’ll address the “cause” issue — the often-made connection with childhood abuse as a cause of BPD. I’ll address the other issues in later posts.

“There is evidence that people with BPD are more likely to report a history of child abuse or other distressing childhood experiences,” says Dr. Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault. “But, many people who have experienced child abuse do not have BPD, and many people with BPD were not abused or maltreated as children.” As Dr. Marikis made clear in his presentation, recent studies indicate that brain chemistry and genetics play a large part in BPD; it correlates with a heritable variation in how the brain uses serotonin.

Dr. Marsha Linehan, who developed dialectical behavior therapy, argues that  biology interacts with the environment. If someone has a strong genetic inclination toward BPD, it may be triggered by parents who are merely undemonstrative, not abusive or neglectful.

Research shows that 40%-70% of BPD sufferers report childhood abuse. That’s a lot, of course, and it makes sense that abuse and neglect would contribute to BPD symptoms such as fear of abandonment and difficulty in relationships. But look at the issue another way: 30% to 60% of BPD sufferers do not report abuse. That’s also a whole lot of people, maybe over half, and so maybe the offhand assumptions about abuse as a cause is misleading.

I’m reminded of Dr. Robert O. Friedel, who in Borderline Personality Disorder Demystified: An Essential Guide for Understanding and Living with BPD writes movingly about his sister Denise, who suffered from BPD. Denise had emotional difficulties literally from birth; she cried more than her siblings and was difficult to soothe. In childhood, she would attack her sisters and brothers in violent rages and break their belongings. She seemed to have begun life with a strong biological disposition to BPD. Friedel’s mother surmised that the anesthetic she had received during Denise’s birth (and not for her four other children) had somehow affected Denise’s brain.

Friedel himself absolves his mother of any responsibility for his sister’s illness. He writes, 

“One of my most vivid memories of my mother was the way her face would light up whenever she saw one of the family. It made me feel good to my core to be caught in the radiance of her smile and the warmth of her embrace. I would watch her bestow the same love on every member of our family…There was never any doubt: she loved us all deeply and unequivocally.” (page 22) 

Dr. Friedel’s sister seems to have been born with BPD or so inclined to develop it that a stimulus like an anesthetic, if her mother’s intuition holds true, triggered her disorder. In Missing I predict that at some future date, parents (often meaning “mothers”) will be let off the hook, as they have finally been in respect to autism and schizophrenia.

That is, though BPD is in many cases probably triggered by trauma, violence, or neglect (and those cases might be the most difficult and hardest to treat), in other cases the sufferer comes from loving, if inevitably imperfect, parents.

Posted in BPD-Related | 3 Comments

Hope (for Snacks) Springs Eternal

I look forward to walking my dog in the park on beautiful days like this — letting him off-leash to run wild and free through the grass, breathing the fresh air, unfettered as his wild canine ancestors.

Instead, he sniffs the candy wrappers and fast-food detritus littered all over the landscape. He lingers by the outdoor grills and loves the trash cans best of all.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment