Changing My Status, Except Not Really

A while back, I noticed I had never listed a relationship status for myself on Facebook. After decades of marriage, I felt confident in listing my status as “married.” I first clicked “Edit Profile” and then “Family and Relationships,” and then edited my relationship status, remedying my previous oversight.

Possibly due to my own aged-person ineptitude, or possibly due to other people’s misunderstanding, I’ve encountered questions and concerns ever since.  Suddenly, anniversary best wishes were pouring in, followed by inundations of congratulations. Facebook connects you to people you don’t see often and whom you don’t even know well. When on occasion I run into some of these, they remember to ask, commiserate, and/or congratulate.

“I don’t know what happened, Kathy,” such a person recently told me, gravely placing her hand on my forearm. “But, whatever it was, I’m happy for you, and congratulations.”

Facebook may think I changed my status, and I may have mistakenly made it seem like I changed my status, but I didn’t really change my status. This is just to clarify, today, on my 37th wedding anniversary, my actual relationship status is unlikely to change until one of us dies or kills the other one.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Missing Dave

In all the hoopla over David Letterman’s retirement, we read over and over about the heart surgery, the post-9/11 show, and the sex scandal. Everyone mentions favorite guests Julia Roberts, Regis Philbin, Bill Murray, and Cleveland’s own Harvey Pekar. Frequently cited are watermelons tossed from the roof of the Ed Sullivan Theater, Stupid Pet Tricks, Top Ten Lists, and Dave, wearing an Alka-Seltzer suit, immersed in a giant water tank.

All noteworthy, to be sure, though I never cared much for tossing things off the roof. But it’s all been said, over and over. I don’t want to repeat the usual tropes, but I have an urge to express my affection and respect for David Letterman, who, in all his incarnations, is my favorite TV experience. Because we don’t get cable, I’m missing out on the current Golden Age of TV—no Sopranos, no Wire, no Breaking Bad. Mystifying my friends, I don’t care a whit about “Downton Abbey.” I have binge-watched only one show: “In Therapy” with Gabriel Byrne. Instead, I have enjoyed many foolish comedies: “Cheers,” “Everybody Loves Raymond,” “The Office,” and, currently, “Modern Family.”

My Dave fandom, though, is deeper and wider. I actually saw a few episodes of his 1980 morning show and liked them. I used to enjoy his stand-up appearances on “The Tonight Show” and  would even defend his hosting of the Oscars. I watched Dave almost every night for almost thirty years. My husband, cinephile and movie exhibitor, often gets home late, and we watched Dave together. Otherwise, my husband doesn’t watch TV, so this was a rare bonding, extra-cinematic, entertainment experience. We both love Dave.

So here I want to share two things that haven’t appeared widely. One is an insight I read somewhere online. The other is a very slight, beloved quirk of Dave, again, unmentioned in most of the written hoopla.

I can’t locate the column right now, but one writer made this cogent observation. Dave made you feel like you were in on the joke, making an inclusive group of his audience. Maybe this is what put some people off, because, watching only occasionally, they’d feel excluded instead of included. But if you watched regularly, you understood some things. Why did Dave run across the stage every night when his name was announced? Because he did it the first night back after his heart surgery to show his robust health. Why did he repeat jokes so often? Because the repetition itself was funny. He had certain favorites: George W. Bush walking into a door, a deer rearing up and pummeling a hunter, Dave and Paul Shaffer shouting together, “I wouldn’t give his problems to a monkey on a rock!” These were funny because they were so silly and because you were sharing a joke with Dave. Dave liked “Will it Float?” and “Is This Anything?” and you were inclined, if you liked Dave, to go along with these nonsensical bits.

Dave was known for being private and press-avoidant to the point of surliness. However, you could watch Dave regularly and feel that you almost knew him, although you’d never crack the mystery of his complicated self. “He’s the most three-dimensional talk-show host ever — hell, he’s probably the most vividly revealed person who’s ever been on television,” wrote Entertainment Weekly’s Ken Tucker. “The sheer number of hours, combined with a compulsive honesty that trumps reticence, means that he has exposed more moods and aspects of his personality than any human in front of a TV camera.” Jay Leno, in contrast, reputedly so personable and “nice,” is a complete blank to me. He likes cars and has a solid marriage to a good woman, but otherwise, I don’t know a thing about him. Jay told jokes, whereas Dave was himself part of the joke. Which you prefer is a matter of taste, I suppose.

Finally, here’s one of my favorite Letterman quirks. I’m sure it’s been written about somewhere, but I’ve never seen it. Dave habitually put a “the” in front of things where “the” didn’t belong. On rare occasions, a guest would smile and repeat Dave’s verbiage, noting the idiosyncrasy, but mostly it went unremarked.

“Breaking Bad,” cited above, would be instead “The Breaking Bad,” or possibly  “the Breaking Bad program.” Julia Roberts starred in, for example, “The Steel Magnolias” and “The Pretty Woman,” and Bill Murray in “The Caddy Shack.”

I don’t know why Dave did this, and I can’t explain why it’s amusing. It set Dave apart, just a little bit. Like the Sneezing Monkey, Dave found it funny for his own reasons, and I for one am already missing it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Ewing Kind of Day

After my Mother’s Day brunch at Corky and Lenny’s this morning, my husband John asked me what else I wanted to do today. I suggested that he and our son and I take a little walk in a park with our dog. He asked which park I would like to visit.

“Euclid Creek or Acacia,” I said. These are two large Metroparks near our house.

“We can’t go anywhere where there are other dogs,” he said. “There’s that dog flu going around.”

I had no response to that.

“Or coyotes,” he added. Coyotes are rumored to have been spotted at Acacia. “Maybe we could go to that park by the Recreation Pavilion.”

“Forest Hills Park,” my son and I said together. “They don’t allow dogs there.”

“They do let dogs there,” he said. “We could go to Cain Park.”

“OK,” I said. “I think maybe they do let dogs at Cain Park. I haven’t been there for a long time. Let’s go there.”

“But there’s nothing to see at Cain Park,” John said. What John likes to see at any park is water. There’s no water at Cain Park.

“Why did you suggest Cain Park then?” I asked.

“I didn’t say Cain Park. I said the park by the Recreation Pavilion.”

My son and I looked at each other. We told John he had suggested Cain Park. He denied it.  Apparently he was mixing the parks up. We dropped it.

Then John said, “We could go up to the lake.” That would fulfill his water-viewing needs, so I said okay. On the way to Lakefront Lodge Park in Willowick, John was wondering out loud about Biagio’s, a doughnut shop somewhere nearby that had recently won Northeast Ohio’s Best Donuts People’s Choice Award. John is a doughnut connoisseur.

At the park, it was overcast and breezy but beautiful. I was wearing a skirt and sandals, not dressed for climbing down the steep slope to the lake and walking on the rocks. I sat on a bench looking out at slate-blue Lake Erie fading into the grayish horizon. The dog sat on my lap. My son returned before John and asked, “What are the chances we’re going to stop for custard on the way home?” I imagined the chances were pretty good.

On the way out of the parking lot, John turned left, and I knew he was headed to CP’s Cooler, an ice-cream shop on Vine Street. We pulled in and took turns watching the dog and going inside to order our ice cream. We sat chatting, and then, as we were finishing our ice cream, John suddenly jumped up, saying, “I’ll go inside and ask them.” My son and I wondered if he was going to ask them why New York City has an ordinance forbidding the exhibition of nitrate film, which is what we had been talking about.

It turned out John wanted to know where the doughnut shop Biagio’s was. Right down the street, as it turned out!  So we headed down Vine Street and pulled into Biagio’s, where John got a bag of doughnuts.

We took the long way home, because John wanted to show us the Ford dealership in Wickliffe where he had recently gotten his car repaired. On the way, he pointed out the route he had walked while waiting for his car to be finished. “And that’s where I got a tattoo,” he said, pointing to the Atom Bomb Tattoo parlor. He was kidding.

When we got home, I took a nap, and then my daughter called. All in all, it was a very nice Mother’s Day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Getting Things Done!

Today being one of my first days off from school (the semester actually ends on Friday with my last final, but it begins to feel like vacation already), I had a mental list of nagging things to attend to. How happy I would be to put mental check marks next to each item on my mental check list!

Here were four tasks I set for myself today: replacing the lining in my winter coat, buying a new hair-catching drain thingy for our upstairs sink, reupholstering a disreputable living room chair, and getting rid of a large pipe in our backyard.

First, I took my big black wool coat to a shop that advertises alterations, because its shredded lining drove me crazy all winter. The nice lady at the counter took one look and said in a vaguely East-European accent, “At least $150. Better just buy new coat.” The cost seemed high, way higher than I expected to pay for lining. So I stopped by a dry cleaner where a young Asian woman told me the same amount. At home later on, I received a return call from another shop where a possibly Russian woman told me labor would be $100; fabric would be additional. “Probably about one hundred fifty,” she said, if I understood her correctly. I returned the coat to the closet.

Then I visited my local hardware store to buy a little cup for the drain in our upstairs sink. The drain was replaced the other day by our new handyman, who told me, “The little catcher you have is a little too big. You need one size smaller.”

The guy at the hardware store looked at me as though I was speaking gibberish, or Martian. Which always happens to me in hardware stores. “Your new drain should have come with something like this,” he said. “It doesn’t have something like this?” I explained that our handyperson had instructed me to come to the hardware store to get a new thingy. But it turns out no one makes a smaller size. The one-inch size we had was the smallest size available on earth. Our new handyman apparently installed some weirdly non-standard drain which will no doubt clog again because no hair-catcher fits it.

Undaunted, determined to cross at least one item off my list, I entered the upholstery shop on the same strip as the hardware store. I had come prepared with a photo of our chair, highlighting its shredded arm. I waited while the proprietor helped another client. At last he turned to me and gazed at my photo. “Ah, another wing chair!” he said in a vaguely East European accent. “Look at the books I have!” He gestured to the shelves of upholstery sample books he had all around the room. Hundreds of them.

“Uh,” I said, intimidated by the number of books and pages. “I want a similar fabric. Can you help me find something?” He looked at my picture again, skeptically.

“You want novelty?” he said. I told him I didn’t think of the old-fashioned book-themed print as “novelty” exactly.

“Look on computer,” he said. “Find what you want. Then bring back to me.”

“I was actually hoping for some idea of cost? An estimate?” I asked.

He raised both arms in the air and shouted, “Everyone asks this! How can I say with no fabric? Say $5000! How is that?”

I smiled sheepishly and skulked out of the shop, realizing only gradually that he didn’t actually mean $5000. Still, I have no idea how much reupholstering the chair would cost.

One item remained on my list. For years (years), we’ve had a long metal pipe lying tucked up against our backyard fence. I have no idea how it got there. One time, we left it out for the garbage men, but they didn’t take it. Too long, too heavy, too big. So today, after procrastinating for years, I called the city and asked to arrange for a pickup. I will get this one thing done today, I thought to myself.

“How long is it?” the guy on the phone asked, in regular Ohio English. I had thought of this! I had measured it before I called! About 20 feet, I told him.

He conferred with his boss for a minute.

“You’ll have to cut it up,” he said. “Four-foot lengths, or they won’t pick it up.”

“Cut it?” I asked. “With what? How would you cut it?”

“A pipe cutter,” he said, which made sense. “You don’t have a pipe cutter?”

No, I said. I don’t have a pipe cutter. Neither in the sense of a tool, or in the sense of a person who cuts pipes. My husband doesn’t cut pipes. Neither do I. No pipe cutter.

Two footnotes I would like to add. The foreign accents I mentioned, mostly East European, have no relevance to the story. No xenophobia here. Except for the upholstery guy, who was a little volatile, they were perfectly polite. The accent is just a realistic detail.

And, yes, these are First-World problems, and I have nothing significant to complain about.

I realize that.

 

Posted in Teaching, Uncategorized | 13 Comments

“Stories Matter. Many Stories Matter”

 

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

While reading Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s epic novel Americanah, I checked out YouTube for a glimpse of her and found two TED talks. One’s on feminism, and the other is called “The Danger of a Single Story.”

In the “story” talk, Adichie explains how often we swallow a single version of a person or place and make it the whole story in our minds. As a Nigerian, she’s sensitive to the single versions of Africa—an entire continent, for God’s sake—she encounters here in the U.S. For example, her American college roommate asked how Adichie could speak such fluent English, not realizing that English is Nigeria’s official language. Then she wanted to hear Adiche’s “tribal music,” to which Adichie reponded by offering to play her Mariah Carey tape. Then she was surprised Adichie knew how to operate a stove. The roommate had arrived in college with a single story of Africa—a poor and dark place, uplifted by a rich tribal and linguistic culture. Adichie says, “So that is how to create a single story, show a people as one thing, as only one thing, over and over again, and that is what they become.”

I soon had good reason to reflect on Adichie’s eloquent words: “The single story creates stereotypes, and the problem with stereotypes is not that they are untrue, but that they are incomplete. They make one story become the only story.”

This semester, I am teaching my education seminar at what I call the MPU, the More Prestigious University. Though I usually enjoy my MPU students, I prefer my students at Cleveland State University, a more working-class and diverse workplace. I view MPU kids as affluent, privileged, and often entitled. I assume their parents have well-paying jobs and good educations. I frequently consider leaving there, because I don’t feel close to or needed by MPU students, who, I assume, will all be fine in life without me. They’re getting a fancy degree at a high-priced college and will proceed smoothly into an upper-ten-percent adult life. 

The day after I heard Adichie’s talk, our class was discussing the value of homework. One student proposed that it helps bridge the gap between home and school, because parents can help kids with their assignments. She was quick to acknowledge that many parents might be working too much, too exhausted, or not educationally prepared to help their kids, but, still, homework at least allowed for the possibility. Other students weighed in.

I then asked the students how many had received parental help on their grade-school and high-school homework, expecting that all or most of them would raise their hands. Surprisingly, only about half did. The discussion proceeded, but I circled back to the question. Why, I wondered, did some of you not raise your hands?

A high-achieving girl responded that both her parents had hated school and didn’t do well in it. They lacked both the ability and interest to help her. Another student, of Vietnamese descent, told us that her mother had attended school only through third grade. This student has helped her mother more than vice versa, by, for instance, writing all her emails for her. Another student described how earnestly her foster mother had tried to help her, but that she was ill-equipped to do so. I got stuck on “foster mother,” words I didn’t expect to hear from an MPU student.

Like Adichie, who admits to her own “single stories” about Mexicans and poor people, I had to acknowledge my own. What I’d regarded as a harmless bias was actually an inaccurate, limiting perspective. In Adichie’s words, “The consequence of the single story is this: It robs people of dignity. It makes our recognition of our equal humanity difficult. It emphasizes how we are different rather than how we are similar.” The distance I’d always experienced between me and these students might not be their privilege, but rather my own prejudice.

 

 

 

Posted in Books, Teaching, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

A Doglike Dog in Springlike Weather

 

In her sad place

Today I’ve had my first daily requirement of Vitamin D in months. Since November at least. I took a half-hour walk outdoors in the sunshine. In the sunshine.

The birds were singing. The snow is melting. And did I mention the sun is shining?

I even took along our little dog Roxie. She regarded the outside world today like an indoor cat who sets one hesitant foot on the threshold and pulls back, having heard tell about coyotes. She darted along beside me, skittishly glancing over her shoulder with a worried expression, seeming to ask,  “Why are we doing this exactly?”

It’s not like she hasn’t been outdoors, or even on “walks,” during this long, cold season. Her scrawny seven-pound self has been out on the driveway several times a day, and even occasionally down the driveway to the front sidewalk. She’s climbed up on some snowdrifts—too light to break through the crust, of course—and gotten her business done. Then she’s hustled back inside, trembling with cold and sometimes pathetically holding up one foot or the other, feigning frostbite.

If you are one of those large-dog snobs, a person who would never compare your dog to a cat, even as a joke, a person who brags about their Malamute bounding through the snowdrifts, impervious to cold, just stop right there.  Dogs come in different colors, sizes, and shapes, just like people, and little dogs (now that I have a little dog) should not be scorned. We celebrate differences in this enlightened age, right?

In most ways, our little dog is extremely doglike. I used to say that our old dog Shucks must have read the manual on how to be the family dog. He barked at the mailman, stuck his head out the car window, and greeted us deliriously when we came home. He checked off all the requisite dog behaviors, satisfying in his very ordinariness. All he ever had to do was act like a dog, and he did it perfectly.

So too with Roxie. My daughter says she’s like a stuffed toy robot, programmed to act like a dog. (Having just seen Blade Runner, I’d call her a replicant.) She becomes unhinged when the mailman comes, climbing on the back of the couch to watch for him and flinging herself against the front door to scare him away. She darts after squirrels. She growls maniacally when attacking her favorite toy (The Fox).

Her little chest is filled with a big-dog heart, in other words. She just doesn’t like the cold.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

Funny Spam

A comment about one of my posts about tutoring GED:

This leads to the energetic goal failing annd thee vision is restarted by that with all the money you used in the gunshop returned to you!

No mention in the original post, by the way, of visions or money or gunshops. I’m especially fond of the “thee.” It gives the spam an Elizabethan twist.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Movie out of Time

I leapt outside my comfort zone today and saw Blade Runner, Ridley Scott’s 1982 cult film, at my husband’s venue, the Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque. Normally this would be an easy call: I don’t see Blade Runner. I’ve never seen Blade Runner. I’m not a Blade Runner sort of person. I’m not a science fiction fan, I don’t do violence, I don’t see boys’ movies, I rarely see cult films. The dark futuristic milieu does not appeal.

But then. As the week went on, I began having second thoughts. This is an iconic film a lot of people love. My husband told me that some fans give it a spiritual interpretation I might find appealing. And then I thought about John’s guiding principle—to follow directors you find interesting. Since I loved Thelma and Louise, which Ridley Scott directed, maybe I should see another film in his oeuvre.

Oh, yes. And then there’s Harrison Ford. 1982 Harrison Ford , no less.

So I entered the strange and labyrinthine world of Blade Runner. Not only the dark futuristic city created by  Scott and special effects whiz Douglas Trumbull, but the strange and labyrinthine world of a cult film in three versions: the original Hollywood version, a second cut over which Scott had some influence (the Director’s Cut), and a third iteration over which Scott had total control, the Final Cut.  I saw the Final Cut. I like hearing about the creative process, so the complexity of the movie’s genesis provided a frisson of interest for me.

I liked the movie’s ending—one of the bones of contention among aficionados. What does the unicorn mean? Is Ford’s character a replicant or not?  It was fun hearing from the fan boys after the show debating the differences among the versions and the drastic departures from the Philip K. Dick novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?  I admired the immensely  imaginative special effects, and I also enjoyed the Vangelis music. Among the fine performances, Darryl Hannah’s heart-of-ice replicant was stunning.

And then there was Harrison Ford. The chiseled Rutger Hauer was a bonus.

Otherwise, I must admit a lot of the movie seemed predictable and sophomoric. For me, sci fi dealing with heavy subjects like mortality often becomes dopey in an old Star Trek kind of way. I feel bad about how snobby this sounds. Also, the movie’s violence was too much for me, and I mentally objected to having kids in the audience. I realize, though, that I have a counter-cultural mentality here; I’m a violence prude and can’t inflict my values on others. I inflicted them on my kids for as long as I could, and that’s as far as my authority goes.

A few interesting anachronisms struck me during the movie, set in 2019, a mere four years in the future. Photographs serve as a significant plot device; they represent the fake memories installed in the android replicants. Who knew, in 1982, how quickly photos would migrate to, of all things, our telephones? It’s not impossible that people would be cherishing family pictures printed on photographic paper in 2019, but it seems a little dated. Which brings up the 21st century ubiquity of cell phones, where most of our photos are now stored. How could Scott and his screenwriters have predicted it? Blade Runner features technology, computers, and screens aplenty, but no hand-held devices. Finally, in a suspenseful scene when Ford is dangling from a ledge (a la Cary Grant in North by Northwest), a plain old regular watch encircles his wrist. It doesn’t even look digital.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Books, Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Project of Human Freedom

 

Alix Kates Shulman

 

Alix and me

This evening on our drive to the airport with our 82-year-old visitor, the writer and feminist activist Alix Kates Shulman, the conversation centered on Apple computers, social media, and Spotify. Self-described as “indefatigable,” Ms. Shulman had had a busy day. After breakfasting with Cleveland friends and breezing through the Cleveland Museum of Art, she introduced the documentary She’s Beautiful When She’s Angry (in which she appears) and answered questions afterwards. Twenty years her junior, I would have needed a nap, but Ms. Shulman showed no signs of fatigue. Then her flight back to New York was delayed, a setback she accepted with unruffled good humor.

Ms. Shulman is one of about a dozen second-wave feminists interviewed in the film, exhibited in a film program my husband curates, directed by Mary Dore, which covers the years 1966-1971 of the movement in the U.S. Others include Kate Millett, Ellen Willis, Rita Mae Brown, Eleanor Holms Norton, and Susan Brownmiller. All are lively, funny, and articulate—belying the stereotype of the stodgily intense feminist. They’re vital and passionate and still hopeful.

The film reveals the immense courage of women who stood up, asked questions, wrote books, marched, and sometimes shouted. There were internal divides and occasional missteps, but the consistent message of equal pay for equal work, recognition of sexual harassment and sexual violence, equitable employment opportunities, advocacy for women’s health and for families, has largely taken hold. They imagined change, and then made it happen.

When we got home from the airport, out of nowhere I thought of a 94-year-old friend, a liberated woman in many ways, but a mom and wife who took no active part in the movements of the sixties and seventies. A few times when we’re driving somewhere, she’s made comments about men pushing strollers or carrying a baby in a back-pack. It looks funny, she says. Her husband would never have done such a thing, she says. Her husband—a dear man and a great father, by the way—would have seemed emasculated to his own wife if he made such a small gesture toward sharing childcare as pushing a stroller.

It’s a change in the world wrought by the women’s movement, with the help of open-hearted men. We’re accustomed to seeing men taking care of their kids, at least those of us younger than 90, and though there’s still a lot of work to do, we’re not going back. Women can be senators and CEO’s, and men can be caregivers. The film conveys the message articulated by Andrew O’Hehir in his Salon review:  “Whatever mistakes have been made along the path and however the movement has been stereotyped, the essential project of feminism has always been the project of human freedom.”

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Incunabulum

Here it is.

Tonight we’re addressing Christmas cards. After thirty-plus years, we have the routine down. John does his people, and I do mine and I can’t tell you exactly how we know whose names are whose.

I rely on my old, water-stained address book, which sits mostly neglected next to the dish drainer. Hence the water stains. Duct tape binds it together. Ordinarily, my phone provides addresses nowadays, with an occasional assist from the Internet. The faded address book dates from probably twenty-five years ago. It contains much of my life’s archeology.

As I open the book, gingerly, and begin paging through it, I can’t help noticing the deaths. Sometimes, everyone on a page is gone: cousins, elderly relatives, and friends and neighbors. Then there are the people who have moved twice, three times, or more, and their crossed-out addresses remind me of old visits and past relationships.

Without this book, I wouldn’t remember the name of the elderly sight-impaired woman who used to live across the street. I’d forget the homeschooled child who studied Latin with me. My kids’ babysitters? Their names aren’t stored in my memory, but they’re in the book.

My nieces and nephews and kids went to college and moved from place to place: here’s the record. Most of all, I note the friends I no longer see and to whom I no longer send cards. So many relationships fade away. My church closed a few years ago, and though I’ve tried to stay in touch with those friends, some have dropped away. I don’t have much in common any more with parents of my kids’ friends: no more play dates to organize. This old book even contains some celebrities’ addresses and phone numbers, like the writers Annie Dillard, Jonathan Kozol, and Phillip Lopate. I never deluded myself that we were friends, but it was fun to record their contact information after I’d interviewed them.

In truth, my old address book contains a few names I no longer even recognize. Maryann and Nan and Donna, whoever they are–are not getting any Christmas cards from me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment